On Sunday 02 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
+pkglib_PROGRAMS = foo
+doc_LIBRARIES = libquux.a
Another nit: can we find less obviously bogus combinations that users
might actually want to use? It is sometimes necessary to put _DATA in
libdir (if only because there is no automake
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:23:48PM CET:
On Sunday 02 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 10:57:57AM CET:
Ok for maint?
OK with nits addressed. Do we have testsuite coverage for this?
Not yet, but once this
On Sunday 02 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:23:48PM CET:
On Sunday 02 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 10:57:57AM CET:
Ok for maint?
OK with nits addressed. Do we have
Ok for maint?
Regards,
Stefano
-*-*-*-
docs: how to work around checks on invalid primary/directory couple
* doc/automake.texi (Uniform): Document the blessed idiom which can
be used to work around Automake checks on invalid primary/directory
couples (such as `lib_PROGRAMS' or