Re: [PATCH] docs: how to work around checks on invalid primary/directory couples

2011-01-02 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 02 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: +pkglib_PROGRAMS = foo +doc_LIBRARIES = libquux.a Another nit: can we find less obviously bogus combinations that users might actually want to use? It is sometimes necessary to put _DATA in libdir (if only because there is no automake

Re: [PATCH] docs: how to work around checks on invalid primary/directory couples

2011-01-02 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:23:48PM CET: On Sunday 02 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 10:57:57AM CET: Ok for maint? OK with nits addressed. Do we have testsuite coverage for this? Not yet, but once this

Re: [PATCH] docs: how to work around checks on invalid primary/directory couples

2011-01-02 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 02 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:23:48PM CET: On Sunday 02 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 10:57:57AM CET: Ok for maint? OK with nits addressed. Do we have

[PATCH] docs: how to work around checks on invalid primary/directory couples

2010-12-25 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Ok for maint? Regards, Stefano -*-*-*- docs: how to work around checks on invalid primary/directory couple * doc/automake.texi (Uniform): Document the blessed idiom which can be used to work around Automake checks on invalid primary/directory couples (such as `lib_PROGRAMS' or