Re: preparing for a new release

2020-11-15 Thread Karl Berry
Hi Jim - (and thanks for the test runs and logs, Gavin) make -k check TESTS='t/txinfo-no-clutter' \ AM_TESTSUITE_MAKE="make -j$(( 2*$(nproc) + 1 ))" I know little about programming for parallel (auto)make, but I'm guessing that with the above invocation, the make

Re: preparing for a new release

2020-11-15 Thread Jim Meyering
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 6:52 PM Karl Berry wrote: > > Hi Jim - (and thanks for the test runs and logs, Gavin) > > make -k check TESTS='t/txinfo-no-clutter' \ > AM_TESTSUITE_MAKE="make -j$(( 2*$(nproc) + 1 ))" > > I know little about programming for parallel (auto)make,

Re: preparing for a new release

2020-11-15 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 09:45:44AM -0800, Jim Meyering wrote: > I've fixed a few of these failures, but here is still at least one > that I have not fixed: t/txinfo-no-clutter. In this case, running it > with no parallelism and by itself passes: > make -k check TESTS='t/txinfo-no-clutter' > Yet

Re: preparing for a new release

2020-11-15 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 09:45:44AM -0800, Jim Meyering wrote: > Karl has made quite a few improvements, so I'm preparing to make a new > release. But first, I wanted to make the tests pass reliably also when > running them in parallel (the only way I run them, because otherwise, > they take way

preparing for a new release

2020-11-15 Thread Jim Meyering
Karl has made quite a few improvements, so I'm preparing to make a new release. But first, I wanted to make the tests pass reliably also when running them in parallel (the only way I run them, because otherwise, they take way too long). I run a command like this: make check