From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which version of Automake are you using? What make implementation?
I'm always afraid to answer this question, because our distributed
development environment is old and impossible (for me) to update. But,
here goes:
1194
From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry to insist, but you still haven't answered the most basic
question: what automake version are you using?
Begging your pardon, but this is a quote from my reply to your message
that was sent both to the group and to you directly:
I'm
Hi, everyone,
Replies I got from this group with regards to a problem I was having in
my build environment (that used Automake 1.4) led me to request a
version upgrade. I am now able to use Automake 1.7. (Better, eh?)
After running automake on my existing configure.in, I received the
following
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure, but I think another possibility might be that the
right aclocal program is still finding the old 1.4 macros.
Hmmm... I think you're on to something. The previous build owner added
some additional macros to the default source of aclocal macros. He put
Hi, everyone,
A couple of weeks back I posted my problems with getting an ancient
version of Automake to build two libraries. Each was to use the same
source but one should have it's objects compiled with -DFEATURE. I
attempted to use the following setup:
quote
noinst_LIBRARIES = normal.a
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quote
noinst_LIBRARIES = normal.a normal-feature.a
normal_a_SOURCES = [bunch of files]
normal_feature_a_SOURCES = $(normal_a_SOURCES)
normal_feature_a_CFLAGS = -DFEATURE
/quote
...
Where have I gone wrong?
Of course, when my source files are C++ files the _CFLAGS
I didn't. But I do now.
Thanks,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ben Pfaff
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 1:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Target-specific CFLAGS
Drummonds, Scott B [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
