AC_LIBOBJ and C++

for) autoconf 2.57 and automake 1.7.5 Thanks for any pointers. All the best, Norman -- -- Norman Gray http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFC: Building a Shared Library (take 2)

-- -- Norman Gray http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFC: Building a Shared Library (take 2)

for this chore -- I'm sure I'm very far from being the only one who's benefited. All the best, Norman -- --- Norman Grayhttp://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow

missing --run/not run

-- -- Norman Gray http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: missing --run/not run

Greetings, Following up on my previous message. On Friday, August 29, 2003, at 10:56 PM, Norman Gray wrote: The problem is, of course, the `missing' script, and what happens when a checked-out generated file apparently needs to be rebuilt on a developer's machine. [...] There seems

Re: missing --run/not run

`missing' can be made to be enough (if I'm not missing some problem (ho ho)). All the best, Norman -- -- Norman Gray http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow[EMAIL

Re: automake -vs- huge projects

a learning exercise), it would be conceptually straightforward to rewrite automake as a system sitting on top of it. Not _really_ joking, Norman [1] www.scsh.net -- --- Norman Grayhttp

Re: fortran FC patch

-- --- Norman Grayhttp://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Implementing Automake in Scheme

implementation languages for medium- to large-sized projects. All the best, Norman -- -- Norman Gray : Physics Astronomy, Glasgow University, UK http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ : www.starlink.ac.uk

Re: Implementing Automake in Scheme

Bob, On 2004 Aug 7 , at 15.26, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Norman Gray wrote: I didn't know there was such a thing as the `GNU Help Wanted' list, but I've long thought such a project would be an excellent idea. It's a pretty natural language for such a task, and quite a few

Forcing the linking language

, and it consequently does The Right Thing. But this seems like a bit of a hack. There's nothing leaps out from the list archives. Does anyone have any advice? Best wishes, Norman -- -- Norman Gray : Physics Astronomy, Glasgow University, UK

Re: Forcing the linking language

Ralf, On 2004 Oct 18 , at 13.17, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Norman Gray wrote on Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:19:21PM CEST: I'm assembling a (shared) library using convenience libraries: lib_LTLIBRARIES = libfoo.la libfoo_la_SOURCES = libfoo_la_LIBADD = stuff/libconvenience.la Well. Imagine

AM_*FLAGS and autoconf

argued myself into an impasse, and therefore convinced myself that I must be missing something obvious. Can anyone give any advice? Best wishes, Norman -- -- Norman Gray : Physics Astronomy, Glasgow University, UK http

Re: AM_*FLAGS and autoconf

Stepan and all, On 2005 Feb 22 , at 11.54, Stepan Kasal wrote: On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 04:30:13PM +, Norman Gray wrote: Sorry for taking a while to respond -- my list subscription had been suspended by lists.gnu.org _again_, because of the proportion of thus-delivered spam our boundary

Re: Fortran and subdir-objects

currently use automake/autoconf, though that's partly because they currently support Fortran rather poorly. All the best, Norman -- Norman Gray / http://nxg.me.uk eurovotech.org / University of Leicester, UK

Autoconf/automake support for preprocessable Fortran

-- -- Norman Gray : Physics Astronomy, Glasgow University, UK http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ : www.starlink.ac.uk