- Original Message -
> From: "Lukáš Doktor"
> To: "Qianqian Zhu" , "Cleber Rosa"
> Cc: "avocado-devel"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:12:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Avocado-devel] Suggestion for a new maintainer
>
> Dne 21. 11. 18 v 11:22 Qianqian Zhu napsal(a):
> >
> > -
Any thoughts on supporting unittest's expectedFailure() decorator?
Cheers,
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Dear Fran,
I'm sorry for a late response, but with the release we were a bit busier. You
are right, the `mux-inject` is not currently passed to remote execution as a
long time ago we decided to go the safe way and to use whitelist of arguments
passed to remote process. You can find the
Dne 21. 11. 18 v 11:22 Qianqian Zhu napsal(a):
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Cleber Rosa"
>> To: "Lukáš Doktor" , "avocado-devel"
>> , "Qianqian Zhu"
>>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 9:05:13 PM
>> Subject: Re: Suggestion for a new maintainer
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/14/18 1:38 AM,
- Original Message -
> From: "Cleber Rosa"
> To: "Lukáš Doktor" , "avocado-devel"
> , "Qianqian Zhu"
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 9:05:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Suggestion for a new maintainer
>
>
>
> On 11/14/18 1:38 AM, Lukáš Doktor wrote:
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > I'd like to
After looking into the code, apparently there isn't support for
variants/multiplexation in the remote runner:
def run_suite(self, test_suite, variants, timeout=0, replay_map=None,
suite_order="variants-per-test"):
"""
Run one or more tests and report with
