Re: [Avocado-devel] [RFC v3]: Avocado maintainability and integration with avocado-vt

2017-05-03 Thread Andrei Stepanov
> But this actually brings a question: is EL7 + Avocado RPM from official > repo, still RHEL7? I mean, from a QE perspective, is this acceptable? > If not, the only real solution I see is also adding Avocado to EL7. SpiceQe currently sticks to python-virtualenv approach. Python virtual env holds

Re: [Avocado-devel] [RFC v3]: Avocado maintainability and integration with avocado-vt

2017-04-26 Thread Jeff Nelson
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:01:37 -0400 Cleber Rosa wrote: > On 04/25/2017 12:05 PM, Lukáš Doktor wrote: > > Dne 20.4.2017 v 03:42 Cleber Rosa napsal(a): > >> Hi Folks. > >> > > Hello Cleber, > > > > thank you for the updates, in general it's good, I have few minor > >

Re: [Avocado-devel] [RFC v3]: Avocado maintainability and integration with avocado-vt

2017-04-26 Thread Cleber Rosa
On 04/25/2017 12:05 PM, Lukáš Doktor wrote: > Dne 20.4.2017 v 03:42 Cleber Rosa napsal(a): >> Hi Folks. >> > Hello Cleber, > > thank you for the updates, in general it's good, I have few minor > suggestions in-line. > >> This RFC contains proposals and clarifications regarding the >>

Re: [Avocado-devel] [RFC v3]: Avocado maintainability and integration with avocado-vt

2017-04-26 Thread Cleber Rosa
On 04/20/2017 07:06 AM, Andrei Stepanov wrote: > Hello. > > Sounds good. > I would add a small note. > QE teams tend to run their tests against old RHEL (7.0/7.1/7.3) > versions as well. > Maybe this somehow correct your roadmap. > My point is to stay away from useless dependencies. > Ideally

Re: [Avocado-devel] [RFC v3]: Avocado maintainability and integration with avocado-vt

2017-04-25 Thread Lukáš Doktor
Dne 20.4.2017 v 03:42 Cleber Rosa napsal(a): Hi Folks. Hello Cleber, thank you for the updates, in general it's good, I have few minor suggestions in-line. This RFC contains proposals and clarifications regarding the maintenance and release processes of Avocado. We understand there are