Hi, On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:25:40AM -0400, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Michael Banck <mba...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:07:21PM -0400, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > >> We are very proud to announce the availability of Avogadro 1.1.0. > > > > [...] > > > >> Download: https://sourceforge.net/projects/avogadro/files/avogadro/1.1.0 > >> > >> What's New? See the Release Notes: > >> http://avogadro.openmolecules.net/wiki/Avogadro_1.1.0 > > > > The release notes mention that this is a Beta release and that a 1.2.0 > > release is forthcoming. Is this still the case, or was this changed > > later on and 1.1.0 is a stable public release? > > > > If not, what is the timeline for a 1.2.0 release? > > There were a lot of changes made in 1.1.0, and new stability issues > have cropped up since we made the release. I think we should make a > 1.1.1 release addressing some of the stability issues if possible.
Your answer does not address the question whether 1.1.0 is considered to be a "real" release, or a beta/development release leading up to 1.2.0. At this point, I assume that a 1.2.0 release will be unlikely, so distributors should package 1.1.0 (or a possibly forthcoming 1.1.1 release?) while 2.x is still in development, right? Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Avogadro-devel mailing list Avogadro-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avogadro-devel
