Re: [Avogadro-devel] Avogadro2 Tool Priorities

2016-11-16 Thread Jure Varlec
Hi, I have to agree with Jens here, I would definitely prefer always defaulting to navigate. Being in edit mode when the molecule is empty annoys me a lot because I often start empty, but then paste coordinates directly into the cartesian editor. When I try to rotate the view, I instead draw a

Re: [Avogadro-devel] Avogadro2 Tool Priorities

2016-11-16 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
The current default is navigate when loading a molecule, and edit when the molecule is empty. I think that should be preserved, and merging the toolbars back together with priority ordering is the right way to go. On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Jens wrote: > > I agree.

Re: [Avogadro-devel] Avogadro2 Tool Priorities

2016-11-16 Thread Patrick Avery
Sounds reasonable to me! I think I like having navigate as the first tool. On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Geoffrey Hutchison < geoff.hutchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm currently doing some user interface clean-up in Avogadro2. > > One thing I want to revisit is tool order/priority. In

Re: [Avogadro-devel] Moving to C++11/14, ramping up devleopment

2016-11-16 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
> Great goal. I think we should lay out some plans for that, e.g., > http://wiki.openchemistry.org/Avogadro_Roadmap I was reading up on the new GitHub projects feature: https://github.com/blog/2256-a-whole-new-github-universe-announcing-new-tools-forums-and-features