On 3/3/2011 12:08 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
My apologies if this isn't the case, but it appears to me (being new)
that the avr-gcc landscape is a bit fractured:
1) avr-gcc source from the GCC project
2) Bingo600's scripts + patches from the avrfreaks forum
3) Omar's script + patches from the
-Original Message-
From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Stu Bell
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:07 PM
To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] crosstool-NG
I am on if I can help getting the tools together. As I proposed on the
avr-freaks forum I would like to see avr-gcc + patches merging into
the common gcc branch.
Trevor, your idea seems nice, although I would be even more
enthusiastic to put all the patches into the mainstream gcc and then
just
-Original Message-
From: Omar Choudary [mailto:choudary.o...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:39 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: s...@dabells.com; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] crosstool-NG
I am on if I can help getting the tools together. As I
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Omar Choudary choudary.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Trevor, your idea seems nice, although I would be even more
enthusiastic to put all the patches into the mainstream gcc and then
just do a normal cross-build for the tools.
Yes, ideally this would be the best
