Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Using multiple versions of AVR Studio (wasRe: crosstool-NG)

2011-03-05 Thread johnea avr-gcc
On 03/05/2011 04:04 AM, Graham Davies wrote: johnea wrote: Last time I checked, the USB was one of the primary advantages of running the PUEL version [of VirtualBox] versus the community version (which is GPL'd). Ah, then this could explain my problem. As I am using AVR Studio

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Using multiple versions of AVR Studio (was Re: crosstool-NG)

2011-03-04 Thread johnea
. If anyone wanted to write drivers to run the mkII natively on linux it would be straightforward to monitor/analyse the interface. Another vote for VirtualBox... johnea ___ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Using multiple versions of AVR Studio (was Re: crosstool-NG)

2011-03-04 Thread johnea
On 03/04/2011 02:03 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, johnea m...@johnea.net wrote: Another vote for VirtualBox... Which version? Before or after 4? About a year old version: virtualbox_bin 3.1.6-1 It's the VirtualBox Personal Use and Evaluation License (PUEL) Which