t;Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:56 AM
>To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
>Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Optimization Problem?
>
>On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 11:48 -0800, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
>Sorry, again. I am really doing good with this post.
>
>>avr-gcc --version
>avr-gcc
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 13:01 -0800, larry barello wrote:
> Strange rcalls are a fast way to allocate four bytes on the stack for a
> local...
Thanks, Larry.
Looking thru the code, that is what is happening.
tomdean
___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-G
To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Optimization Problem?
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 11:48 -0800, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
Sorry, again. I am really doing good with this post.
>avr-gcc --version
avr-gcc (GCC) 4.3.4
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free softw
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 11:48 -0800, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
Sorry, again. I am really doing good with this post.
>avr-gcc --version
avr-gcc (GCC) 4.3.4
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
NO
warranty; not even for M
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 11:48 -0800, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
>
> However, using -Os, I see strange code at c8, ca, etc. The poly
> calculation and the sin call seem to be below here. The stack is
> cleaned correctly by the 4 ea pop r0's. Why the strange rcalls???
>
Sorry, should read d0, d2.
tomde
