Re: Partial libstdc++ Support

2021-02-02 Thread Klaus Rudolph
Hi, Naturally, much of the C++ standard library isn't remotely suitable for AVRs, and should not be supported. However, there are a fair amount of features that I believe would work very nicely, and would be worthwhile to support. For example, std::array, std::optional, , and the C++ counterpa

Re: Partial libstdc++ Support

2021-02-02 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hey John, > Naturally, much of the C++ standard library isn't remotely suitable for > AVRs, and should not be supported. However, there are a fair amount of > features that I believe would work very nicely, and would be worthwhile > to support. I've been playing with the same thought for a while a

Re: Partial libstdc++ Support

2021-02-02 Thread Klaus
Hi, Naturally, much of the C++ standard library isn't remotely suitable for AVRs, and should not be supported. However, there are a fair amount of features that I believe would work very nicely, and would be worthwhile to support. For example, std::array, std::optional, , and the C++ counterpa