On 04/03/2011 06:20, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Omar Choudarychoudary.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Trevor, your idea seems nice, although I would be even more
enthusiastic to put all the patches into the mainstream gcc and then
just do a normal cross-build for the tools.
On 04/03/2011 05:23, Weddington, Eric wrote:
Hi Stu,
Hope you're doing well. :-)
WinAVR is the Windows packaging of the AVR-GCC stuff, along with
the avr-libc library.
Along with some other stuff, too. ;-)
(In addition, WinAVR is about to be deprecated in favor of a
toolset integrated
Hi David
What you say sounds perfectly reasonable to me. We also use AVR
microcontrollers in a professional environment and have pretty much the same
setup as you describe where we try to use the newest IDE and have several
tool-chains installed that we switch between depending on project. If we
David Brown wrote:
(This is going to sound like an I want rant - which I suppose it is ...
I am a professional developer ... You don't change toolchains in a
project without very good reason ...
So I have a range of WinAVR compilers on my machine ...
It is vital that I can take an old
On 04/03/2011 14:23, Gjermund Stensrud wrote:
Hi David
What you say sounds perfectly reasonable to me. We also use AVR
microcontrollers in a professional environment and have pretty much the
same setup as you describe where we try to use the newest IDE and have
several tool-chains installed
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Graham Davies ecros...@ecrostech.com wrote:
Since you can have only one version of AVR Studio installed at a time and
AVR Studio does not uninstall reliably, this means that I have to re-install
the operating system to switch versions.
Wow, that's crazy!
As a
Weddington, Eric schrieb:
avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
On Behalf Of Stu Bell Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:07 PM To:
WinAVR is the Windows packaging of the AVR-GCC stuff, along with
the avr-libc library.
Along with some other stuff, too. ;-)
(In addition,
-Original Message-
From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:a...@gjlay.de]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 9:15 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: s...@dabells.com; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] crosstool-NG
WinAVR is a great project, it would be a pity if it would die.
Le 04/03/2011 05:23, Weddington, Eric a écrit :
(In addition, WinAVR is about to be
deprecated
in favor of a toolset integrated into AVR Studio. It is on it's last
official
release, at least officially.)
Officially, it's up to me what to do with WinAVR. Admittedly there hasn't been
a lot
-Original Message-
From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Trevor Woerner
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 12:09 PM
To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-gcc-list]
-Original Message-
From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Bernard Fouché
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 9:52 AM
To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list]
On Friday 04 March 2011, Bernard Fouché wrote:
Making all of our AVR code on Linux, I used to download WinAVR to
rebuild a toolchain on Linux, knowing the result would work. Now the
only solution is to go for Bingo600's scripts...
That is not entirely true. You can also use my
Weddington, Eric schrieb:
-Original Message- From: Omar Choudary
I am on if I can help getting the tools together. As I proposed on
the avr-freaks forum I would like to see avr-gcc + patches merging
into the common gcc branch.
Many patches cannot go into mainline GCC because their
-Original Message-
From: Chris Kuethe [mailto:chris.kue...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 10:46 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: Trevor Woerner; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] crosstool-NG
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 08:58, Weddington, Eric
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Weddington, Eric
eric.wedding...@atmel.com wrote:
Sorry for my ignorance, but can you provide a link to crosstool-NG? I think
I'm familiar with what you're referring to. I remember talking to the author
of the crosstool scripts several years ago.
Weddington, Eric schrieb:
-Original Message- From: Georg-Johann Lay
[mailto:a...@gjlay.de] Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 10:37 AM To:
Weddington, Eric Cc: Omar Choudary; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] crosstool-NG
Besides that, I was astonished that fixing bugs
On 04/03/11 20:53, Graham Davies wrote:
I wrote:
Since you can have only one version of AVR Studio installed at a time
and
AVR Studio does not uninstall reliably, this means that I have to
re-install
the operating system to switch versions.
and then Trevor Woerner wrote:
Wow, that's crazy!
David Brown wrote:
Another advantage of using VirtualBox ...
I am convinced of the potential advantages of VirtualBox ... if I could just
quickly and easily solve the problems I am having with it, which are related
to hardware access, particularly USB.
There will almost certainly be a
I've been running WinXP on VirtualBox for a couple of years.
Primarily to debug with AVRStudio using JTAGice-mkII.
On 03/04/2011 12:48 PM, David Brown wrote:
...but USB devices using a Windows host is still a mystery. Sometimes it
works fine, but most of the time it's unreliable.
It's
On 03/04/2011 02:03 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, johnea m...@johnea.net wrote:
Another vote for VirtualBox...
Which version? Before or after 4?
About a year old version: virtualbox_bin 3.1.6-1
It's the VirtualBox Personal Use and Evaluation License (PUEL)
Which
-Original Message-
From: Omar Choudary [mailto:choudary.o...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 4:53 PM
To: Trevor Woerner
Cc: Weddington, Eric; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] crosstool-NG
I'll try to take a look at the tool once I get some spare time.
21 matches
Mail list logo
