David McNab wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like we'd better not have a
wiki, because I can't think of anyone who's got the time to ensure it's
perfect.
Maybe it sounds like that to you. You might want to try taking meaning
from what is actually written though. I wrote:
Who
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 07:23 -0500, Graham Davies wrote:
Wikipedia is full of problems - systemic bias, errors, conflicting
agendas etc, but it's a heck of a lot better than having no wikipedia
at all.
Wikipedia is not full of problems. Pages with bias are marked as such.
Some pages are
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of David McNab
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 11:52 AM
Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr/avr-libc wiki
I'm still concerned that helping with the golden
Eric Weddington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, the current documentation is done via this Doxygen
tool. It's not a perfect tool.
Of course, if someone would want to see something else used, say some
SGML or XML dialect, as long as it's readily available and operating
system independent
David McNab write (in part):
If everyone reading this message can stick up just one page ...
Let's get some really great and complete gcc-avr/avr-libc doco.
I'm just wondering:
Who hosts avrwiki? How do we know it won't suddenly go away? I've had a
bad experience working on a Toyota Prius
Hello, Community!
Graham Davies schrieb:
David McNab write (in part):
If everyone reading this message can stick up just one page ...
Let's get some really great and complete gcc-avr/avr-libc doco.
I'm just wondering:
Who hosts avrwiki? How do we know it won't suddenly go away? I've had
David McNab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That problem could be easily overcome - stick up a wiki at the
avr-libc home page - http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/
We are just guests there, guests to the GNU project and their website
(which is mostly run by volunteers in their spare-time).
Let's see
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:09:42 -0500, Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So you are never supposed
to write it's there, but always it is. This also avoids the
common misspelling of its as it's which interestingly native
speakers are more often a victim of than foreigners.
The Apostrophe
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 16:27 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
The Apostrophe Protection Society home page:
http://www.apostrophe.fsnet.co.uk/
They're making great effort's to purge the language from apostrophe
abuse's.
( /me ducks! )
___
AVR-GCC-list
