For the sake of discussion here, what makes it very easy to extend?
Avrora makes it easy to write monitors which are Java classes that can
receive callbacks when many interesting kinds of simulator events occur:
memory operations, instruction execution, interrupts, etc. A majority of
the
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:13:52AM -0600, Weddington, Eric wrote:
There's a lot of new work being done at the SimulAVR project:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/simulavr
FYI: There's avrora [1] as well. While it's written in Java (which I
detest), it worked so much better for me than
Avrora's main advantage is that it simulates radio chips (CC1000, CC2420,
etc.) found on sensor network nodes. These would be a lot of trouble to
replicate, so I doubt that Avrora's going to go away no matter how good
the new simulavr gets. Avrora is also very easy to extend compared to
-Original Message-
From:
avr-gcc-list-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of John Regehr
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:23 AM
To: AVR-GCC
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Any SimulAVR
Weddington, Eric schrieb:
Hi All,
There's a lot of new work being done at the SimulAVR project:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/simulavr
Specifically the old simulavr project hasn't had much maintenance
done on it in years. There is an avrtest project (hosted at WinAVR)
that is used
Georg-Johann Lay a écrit :
IMO it is absolutely required that a simulator can run as gdb server for
avr-gdb.
Stand alone simulators like avrova seem not to have this functionality.
I just skimmed the avrora site and saw no note pointing in that
direction, maybe I middes it.
Avrora has
Aurelien Francillon au...@naurel.org wrote:
I don't know if simulavr have one (or plan to have one) but that
would be very useful ...
Sure, both the old simulavr as well as simulavrxx offer that feature.
--
cheers, Jorg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
