Re: [avr-gcc-list] Avr-gcc versions comparison

2007-07-05 Thread Clemens Koller
Dmitry K. schrieb: Hi. Below is the results of compiling recent CVS main branch of Avr-libc with a set of avr-gcc versions. Just FYI: GCC 4.2.1 RC1 is now available from: ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2.1-RC-20070703 I hope I'll find some time and test on my PowerPC environments.

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Avr-gcc versions comparison.

2007-02-21 Thread Bruce D. Lightner
Dmitry K. wrote: Hi. I have compile CVS version avr-libc (2007-02-20) with for different compilers. Dmitry, While you are testing, have you checked the code quality for the I/O bit test logic in avr-gcc v4.1.2? I reported the following bad I/O code awhile back with avr-gcc v3.4.6: An

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Avr-gcc versions comparison.

2007-02-21 Thread Joerg Wunsch
Bruce D. Lightner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My mistake. I thought that I had remembered that Dmitry worked on the AVR-specific code generator logic, but maybe that was long, long ago. So, who's the expert now? I guess you're thinking of Anatoly here. He's also a member of the avr-libc team,

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Avr-gcc versions comparison.

2007-02-21 Thread Dmitry K.
On Thursday 22 February 2007 04:37, Bruce D. Lightner wrote: Dmitry K. wrote: Hi. I have compile CVS version avr-libc (2007-02-20) with for different compilers. Results are below. [...] I assume that the Flash and Stack values are in bytes. What are the Time units? Are these