Bernard Foche wrote:
Now why not have an alloca(3) in libc? Sure it is not the best way to
manage dynamic memory but vfprintf/scanf are typicall applications where it
is acceptable. And a functionning alloca() is always handy.
We *are* already having a working alloca. It's within gcc. Only
Russell Shaw wrote on Dienstag, 6. September 2005 04:45 :
- The INTERRUPT() macro has been deprecated, and it will be
removed in a future version. Use __attribute__((interrupt))
explicitly if this functionality is really needed.
Maybe instead of interrupt, you could use
As Bernard Fouche wrote:
Errm, you'd still need to supply a dummy implementation for malloc()
anyway when using the floating-point versions. ...
Now why not have an alloca(3) in libc? Sure it is not the best way
to manage dynamic memory but vfprintf/scanf are typicall
applications where it
Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As malloc() was `in' there (from fdevopen()) anyway, it came in handy.
Of course, if there's consensus among the users that this is not
needed, and an additional 40 bytes on the stack are no big deal for
the floating-point versions, we could easily drop that completely, and
Update of patch #3750 (project avr-libc):
Status:None = Done
Assigned to:None = joerg_wunsch
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Update of bug #12324 (project avr-libc):
Assigned to:None = arcanum
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=12324
Update of patch #3781 (project avr-libc):
Status:None = Done
Assigned to:None = joerg_wunsch
___
Follow-up Comment #3:
Patch applied
Update of bug #12378 (project avr-libc):
Status:None = Fixed
Assigned to:None = joerg_wunsch
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Update of bug #12333 (project avr-libc):
Status:None = Fixed
Percent Complete: 20% = 100%
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
I wished I were in a position (in terms of proper knowledge) of how to do that
rewrite. Could definitely use it :)
Mark E. Scott, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AWS, Inc.
512-478-7727 x 122
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Björn Haase
Sent:
If you know how to build the compiler, we could try a quick hack that will
make it possible for you to use at least the lower 128k. There is one place
where to adjust the increment on the stack due to the return address :-).
Yours,
Bjoern.
Mark E. Scott Jr. wrote on Dienstag, 6. September
Update of bug #14104 (project avr-libc):
Assigned to:None = joerg_wunsch
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=14104
Update of bug #14433 (project avr-libc):
Status:None = Fixed
Assigned to:None = joerg_wunsch
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Update of bug #14224 (project avr-libc):
Status:None = Fixed
Assigned to:None = joerg_wunsch
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
14 matches
Mail list logo
