[avr-libc-dev] -O3 ?

2005-11-11 Thread Bernd Trog
Hello, I'm seeing quite a few -O3 flags when building from HEAD. Is this intentional? __ Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs ___ AVR-libc-dev

[avr-libc-dev] [patch #4611] sleep.h sleep_mode() not interrupt safe

2005-11-11 Thread Risto Eerola
URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?func=detailitemitem_id=4611 Summary: sleep.h sleep_mode() not interrupt safe Project: AVR C Runtime Library Submitted by: eerola Submitted on: Fri 11/11/05 at 19:42 Category: None

Re: [avr-libc-dev] -O3 ?

2005-11-11 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Bernd Trog wrote: I'm seeing quite a few -O3 flags when building from HEAD. Is this intentional? It was intentional, yes, it has only been used on avr3 and avr5 MCUs (i.e. on those with more than 16 KB of ROM). I killed that holy cow now. I never really thought it makes sense at all, as

[avr-libc-dev] [patch #4546] macros.inc/X_movw: R0..R31 addition

2005-11-11 Thread Anatoly Sokolov
Update of patch #4546 (project avr-libc): Status:None = Done Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #13340] Math lib documentation/lib mismatch

2005-11-11 Thread Dmitry K.
On Saturday 12 November 2005 08:07, Anatoly Sokolov wrote: Update of bug #13340 (project avr-libc): Status:None = Fixed Assigned to: aesok = None Open/Closed:Open = Closed

Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc 1.2.6 has been released

2005-11-11 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Dmitry K. wrote: Certainly, I welcome fast release of the bug-fixed version. But I am surprised and get vexed by such haste concerning a bug #14852 (pow() with negative x). Unlike others, it is the extremely serious mistake which result can be destruction of the program. As there is a