[avr-libc-dev] [bug #22377] Wrong XRAMEND for some recent ioXXX.h header files.

URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?22377 Summary: Wrong XRAMEND for some recent ioXXX.h header files. Project: AVR C Runtime Library Submitted by: joerg_wunsch Submitted on: Thursday 02/21/2008 at 15:38 Category:

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #22377] Wrong XRAMEND for some recent ioXXX.h header files.

Update of bug #22377 (project avr-libc): Severity: 4 - Important = 5 - Blocker Priority: 5 - Normal = 9 - Immediate ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Mea Culpa.

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #22377] Wrong XRAMEND for some recent ioXXX.h header files.

Update of bug #22377 (project avr-libc): Status:None = Fixed Percent Complete: 0% = 100% Open/Closed:Open = Closed

[avr-libc-dev] What about to update vfscanf() in 1_6 branch?

Hi. After testing with all GCC versions (3.3.6 - 4.3.X) I intend to update vfscanf() in 1_6 branch (from HEAD). Any objections? Thanks, Dmitry. ___ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org

Re: [avr-libc-dev] What about to update vfscanf() in 1_6 branch?

As Dmitry K. wrote: After testing with all GCC versions (3.3.6 - 4.3.X) I intend to update vfscanf() in 1_6 branch (from HEAD). Any objections? Not at all! Thanks a lot for all your work with this! -- cheers, Jorg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL

RE: [avr-libc-dev] What about to update vfscanf() in 1_6 branch?

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K. Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:13 PM To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-libc-dev] What about to update vfscanf() in 1_6 branch? Hi. After testing with all GCC