Hm...
Is avr-gcc for avr6 ready to use?
I have try avr-gcc 4.4-20080404 (4.3.0 does not support avr6)
with binutils 2.18. In result the small program without any
EEPROM usage and without any inline functions gives incorrect
code:
/* avr-gcc 4.4-20080404 + binutils 2.18 produce incorrect code:
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:24 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878]
eeprom_*_word/dword/block cause hangin ATmega256x
Hm...
Is
Is avr-gcc for avr6 ready to use? Yes, with warnings. Since gcc
insists on the size of a function pointer to be 2 bytes, anything using
function pointers must be used with caution. If the function resides in
the lower half of flash, the 2 byte pointer works fine.
The problem is when the
Standard attachment error with Savannah's mailing lists.
Trying again.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Stu Bell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:40 AM
To: Weddington, Eric; Dmitry K.; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878]
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Weddington, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 1:46 PM
To: Stu Bell; Dmitry K.; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878]
On Thursday 10 April 2008 01:15, Stu Bell wrote:
Is avr-gcc for avr6 ready to use? Yes, with warnings. Since gcc
insists on the size of a function pointer to be 2 bytes, anything using
function pointers must be used with caution. If the function resides in
the lower half of flash, the 2
On Thursday 10 April 2008 08:19, Dmitry K. wrote:
Yes, I have obtain the same result of compilation.
Incorrect is result of linking (avr-objdump -d):
ldi r24, 0
ldi r25, 0
in case of foo4() only.
The trampoline stub for foo4() was created correctly.
Now I have look again
On Thursday 10 April 2008 08:55, Weddington, Eric wrote:
As the AVR Binutils port is not maintaned, IMHO,
Dmitry, I have write-after-approval privs on binutils. You can send me a
patch for binutils.
Eric
Good point.
Thanks,
Dmitry.
___
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 01:38:54PM -0600, Stu Bell wrote:
I'm not sure I should respond to this, as I'm not sure what the asm
directive .rept 3 does.
Having not seen anyone stop to provide an explanation, here's one.
.rept 3
nop
.endr
merely plonks 30,000 NOPs into the
