On Mon 31 Oct 2011 02:04:10 NZDT +1300, Bob Paddock wrote:
Their system won't allow a direct link.
Click on view messages at the bottom left.
There are several related discussions:
Normally it is sufficient to use
++d__attribute__(p)=
And be sure to use '-wlib(1)', not '-wlib(0)'.
That
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #34695 (project avr-libc):
Eric, what changes are you thinking of for better lint-friendliness?
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?34695
___
All this appears to be specific only to some proprietary lint that
unlike gcc doesn't even run everywhere, so not a relevant argument IMHO.
It is one of the most common Lints in commercial environments.
___
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 4:25 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug
-Original Message-
From: Volker Kuhlmann [mailto:invalid.nore...@gnu.org]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:16 AM
To: Volker Kuhlmann; Joerg Wunsch; Weddington, Eric; avr-libc-
d...@nongnu.org
Subject: [bug #34695] fixed width int types without __attribute__()
Follow-up Comment
Thanks for the message, Eric.
As you say, we don't really have enough time to properly investigate the
toolchain and bugs. I've had various reports of various Arduino functions
breaking with newer versions of binutils (2.21, I believe) and haven't had the
resources to track those reports down
Hi All,
FYI, David Mellis (who wrote the message below) is a member of the core
Arduino team. You can see him in a picture with this article:
http://spectrum.ieee.org/geek-life/hands-on/the-making-of-arduino
These are a group of really good guys. They like the AVR, and they like
the AVR GCC
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
So please realize that they are not *trying* to spread FUD. They
just don't have the resources to tackle the toolchain issues
in-depth.
I've only been grumbling since a half-sentence just saying that newer
versions suffer from various problems apparently has such an
Quick heads-up before I rush to work
On Tue 01 Nov 2011 03:08:57 NZDT +1300, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
I've only been grumbling since a half-sentence just saying that newer
versions suffer from various problems apparently has such an
influence to make people not even trying newer toolchain versions
Bob Paddock schrieb:
All this appears to be specific only to some proprietary lint that
unlike gcc doesn't even run everywhere, so not a relevant argument IMHO.
It is one of the most common Lints in commercial environments.
But why clutter avr-libc with lint? You will have
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Georg-Johann Lay
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:30 PM
To: Bob Paddock
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re:
11 matches
Mail list logo