Hi,
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 01:00:44 +0530, Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As Zane D. Purvis wrote:
How about changing the name to ISR, which would do the same thing
as the existing SIGNAL?
Then, SIGNAL and INTERRUPT can both be deprecated (avoiding future
confusion).
It has been
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:52:40PM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As Wojtek Kaniewski wrote:
How about...
#define VECTOR(signame) \
void SIG_ ## signame (void) __attribute__ ((interrupt)); \
void SIG_ ## signame (void)
I don't know. I'm more inclined to use ISR(), but I'd
As Wojtek Kaniewski wrote:
What about the SIG_ prefix? If we'll move to something else than
SIGNAL(), I think that it should be dropped or somehow hidden from
the users.
Very good point. I've been thinking about adding a second set of
vector names anyway. Our names are completely
Joerg Wunsch wrote on Donnerstag, 8. September 2005 20:50 :
As Matthew MacClary wrote:
(About whether to keep avr/interrupt.h or avr/signal.h after
merging their contents.)
My suggestion would be to change INTERRUPT to be the same as
SIGNAL, and then deprecate SIGNAL.
Sorry, but I
For the whole SIGNAL vs INTERRUPT flame:
I'm with 'deprecate booth', cause of ambiguous (and maybe a bit
stupid) naming.
SIGNAL is a normal interrupt, (I'd like INT for it, but integer is
already int, so) i really like the ISR name idea.
since INTERRUPT is an eXtended interrupt (with a sei) it
From: Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As Wojtek Kaniewski wrote:
What about the SIG_ prefix? If we'll move to something else than
SIGNAL(), I think that it should be dropped or somehow hidden from
the users.
Very good point. I've been thinking about adding a second set of
vector names
--- Zane D. Purvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As Matthew MacClary wrote:
(About whether to keep avr/interrupt.h or avr/signal.h after
merging their contents.)
My suggestion would be to change INTERRUPT to be the same as
SIGNAL, and then deprecate SIGNAL.
Joerg Wunsch wrote:
I don't know. I'm more inclined to use ISR(), but I'd rather like to
see other people's opinions on this.
What about the SIG_ prefix? If we'll move to something else than
SIGNAL(), I think that it should be dropped or somehow hidden from the
users.
Obtw., of course,
