David Brown a écrit:
While I agree with your principle here, I think there is good reason for
changing the typedefs in this case - and nothing to lose. People use
different tools with their code, such as static error checkers,
documentation generators, and smart editors like Eclipse. They
On 01/11/2011 13:10, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
David Brown a écrit:
While I agree with your principle here, I think there is good reason
for changing the typedefs in this case - and nothing to lose. People
use different tools with their code, such as static error checkers,
documentation
As David Brown wrote:
The other possible issue that springs to mind is debuggers - will
debuggers always be happy with non-standard definitions of the types?
At least GDB apparently doesn't have a problem, and very likely the
AVR Studio (4 5) debuggers neither. Otherwise, we'd already knew
