Joerg Wunsch schreef:
As Wouter van Gulik wrote:
IMHO, the respective code is hand-crafted asm code in avr-libc.
Are you sure? The code is about a jump table, is that in avr-libc?
Errm, you are right...
We should probably file a bug report at binutils as well. gas is
excepting an
Wouter van Gulik schreef:
Joerg Wunsch schreef:
As Wouter van Gulik wrote:
IMHO, the respective code is hand-crafted asm code in avr-libc.
Are you sure? The code is about a jump table, is that in avr-libc?
Errm, you are right...
We should probably file a bug report at binutils as well.
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
As Thomas Carsten Franke wrote:
I did not restored the NVM CMD because I
didn't know that it would has to be.
This is correct. We recently added a note to the documentation in the
header file avr/pgmspace.h telling that on Xmega devices, all the
On 17/06/10 10:15, Thomas Carsten Franke wrote:
Am 17.06.2010 09:38, schrieb Wouter van Gulik:
Wouter van Gulik schreef:
Joerg Wunsch schreef:
As Wouter van Gulik wrote:
IMHO, the respective code is hand-crafted asm code in avr-libc.
Are you sure?
Hi,
I went into a strange situation in xmega128 project after reading from
signature or calibration row. I used the pgm_read_byte functions after
setting the NVM command accordingly. Both I did with disabled interrupts
to prevent any disturbing. I did not restored the NVM CMD because I
didn't
As Thomas Carsten Franke wrote:
I did not restored the NVM CMD because I
didn't know that it would has to be.
This is correct. We recently added a note to the documentation in the
header file avr/pgmspace.h telling that on Xmega devices, all the
functions will only work as designed if NVM_CMD
As Wouter van Gulik wrote:
Although true, I rather think this is a GCC bug. The avr instruction
documentation says LPM R31, Z+ has undefined results. In the example
it was oke to use LPM R31, Z.
IMHO, the respective code is hand-crafted asm code in avr-libc.
Please file a bug report.
--
As Wouter van Gulik wrote:
IMHO, the respective code is hand-crafted asm code in avr-libc.
Are you sure? The code is about a jump table, is that in avr-libc?
Errm, you are right...
--
cheers, Jorg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
As Wouter van Gulik wrote:
Although true, I rather think this is a GCC bug. The avr instruction
documentation says LPM R31, Z+ has undefined results. In the example
it was oke to use LPM R31, Z.
IMHO, the respective code is hand-crafted asm code in
