[avr-libc-dev] Suggested ISR function

2005-09-08 Thread James A.R. Koehler
I'd vote for depreciating both SIGNAL and INTERRUPT in favour of ISR. Indeed, I'd go further and suggest that it intrinsically be the given the attribute of '__naked__' as, for the life of me, I can't see why it is useful to have r0 and r1 set every time an interrupt occurs. Jim

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Suggested ISR function

2005-09-08 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As James A.R. Koehler wrote: I'd vote for depreciating both SIGNAL and INTERRUPT in favour of ISR. OK. Indeed, I'd go further and suggest that it intrinsically be the given the attribute of '__naked__' as, for the life of me, I can't see why it is useful to have r0 and r1 set every time an