dpc wea...@meer.net writes:
Joerg Wunsch j...@uriah.heep.sax.de writes:
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
I would actually suggest using GCC 4.4.3. It's gotten more testing
than the bleeding edge.
Nevertheless, wouldn't an ICE be worth a (GCC) bug report anyway?
this is gcc 44643
Joerg Wunsch j...@uriah.heep.sax.de writes:
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
I would actually suggest using GCC 4.4.3. It's gotten more testing
than the bleeding edge.
Nevertheless, wouldn't an ICE be worth a (GCC) bug report anyway?
this is gcc 44643
Weddington, Eric eric.wedding...@atmel.com writes:
i had pulled gcc 4.6 to test something else that we noticed was broken
in our local tree and figured i could just save myself the
download-time.
I would actually suggest using GCC 4.4.3. It's gotten more testing than the
bleeding edge.
Joerg Wunsch j...@uriah.heep.sax.de writes:
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
I would actually suggest using GCC 4.4.3. It's gotten more testing
than the bleeding edge.
Nevertheless, wouldn't an ICE be worth a (GCC) bug report anyway?
probably.
although this is a relatively new change (160312
apologies if this is the wrong list or something i missed in the
archives.
short story: i get an ICE w/ gcc 4.6 when building avr-libc-1.4.8.
longer story:
i needed to re-install an avr toolchain and already had binutils/gcc in
source-code-control form laying around so i just re-built them for
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of dpc
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:40 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc
Weddington, Eric eric.wedding...@atmel.com writes:
-Original Message- From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
avr-libc-1.6.8?
apologies if this is the wrong list or something i missed in the
archives.
short story: i get an ICE w/ gcc 4.6 when building
-Original Message-
From: dpc [mailto:wea...@meer.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:54 PM
To: Weddington, Eric; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?
Weddington, Eric eric.wedding...@atmel.com writes:
sorry, that's a typo
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
I would actually suggest using GCC 4.4.3. It's gotten more testing
than the bleeding edge.
Nevertheless, wouldn't an ICE be worth a (GCC) bug report anyway?
--
cheers, Jorg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
