On Monday 24 April 2006 09:25, Björn Haase wrote:
David Carr wrote on Montag, 24. April 2006 09:37 :
Just as a point of reference:
Execution times for the aforementioned benchmark
386 (with 387 co-processor) @ 33MHz
.67s
486DX2 66MHz
.121s
Considering that the AVR is 8bit and
Just as a point of reference:
Execution times for the aforementioned benchmark
386 (with 387 co-processor) @ 33MHz
.67s
486DX2 66MHz
.121s
Considering that the AVR is 8bit and has no hardware floating point, being
only 12x slower than the 386 is impressive especially considering it runs
at 1/5
As David Carr wrote:
AVR
float: 2476.245361328125
error: 23.754638671875
Which is fairly well in line with the 32-bit float results
from the i386.
Is there a way to have sizeof(double) == 8?
Currently not. Volunteers are needed to hammer all this
out, in
