RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22540] Adding signature bytes to header files

2008-05-07 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K. > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 4:20 PM > To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22540] Adding signature > bytes to header fi

Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22540] Adding signature bytes to header files

2008-05-07 Thread Dmitry K.
On Thursday 08 May 2008 08:47, Weddington, Eric wrote: > I have just built it with Anatoly's patch to fix WinAVR bug #1956569: > id=68108&atid=520074> > > I have not tested it yet. If you want to fix the problem with _SFR >

RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22540] Adding signature bytes to header files

2008-05-07 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K. > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 3:42 PM > To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22540] Adding signature > bytes to header fi

Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22540] Adding signature bytes to header files

2008-05-07 Thread Dmitry K.
On Thursday 08 May 2008 07:54, Eric Weddington wrote: [...] > However this will not happen in time for the next WinAVR release. What are the plans of next WinAVR release? Main question is _SFR macroses with Avr6: the old code may be broken in case of _SFR_ASM_COMPAT, and _SFR_ADDR() is doubtful.