[avr-libc-dev] Is list active?

2017-02-07 Thread Wilhelm
___ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Support for AtMega328pb

2017-02-07 Thread Wilhelm Meier
Am 07.02.2017 um 14:21 schrieb Joerg Wunsch: > As Wilhelm Meier wrote: > >> recently I found that there ist not support for the (new) atmega328pb. >> Do you plan to integrate this device? > > Well, recently, the contributions for new devices mainly came from > Atmel, errm, Microchip. > > But of

[avr-libc-dev] Support for AtMega328pb (2nd try)

2017-02-07 Thread Wilhelm Meier
Hello, recently I found that there ist not support for the (new) atmega328pb. Do you plan to integrate this device? If this will not happen timely, how can I do it myself (and send a patch)? Thanks for your reply! ___ AVR-libc-dev mailing list

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Support for AtMega328pb

2017-02-07 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Wilhelm Meier wrote: > recently I found that there ist not support for the (new) atmega328pb. > Do you plan to integrate this device? Well, recently, the contributions for new devices mainly came from Atmel, errm, Microchip. But of course, if you want to submit a patch yourself, feel free to

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Is list active?

2017-02-07 Thread inanc64 .
Yes but not much activity. 2017-02-07 10:33 GMT+01:00 Wilhelm : > > ___ > AVR-libc-dev mailing list > AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev >

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Support for AtMega328pb

2017-02-07 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Wilhelm Meier wrote: > > But of course, if you want to submit a patch yourself, feel free to > > do so. The biggest work is to create the ioxxx.h header file. > ok, obviously done by Fa. Watterott. Are you sure? Or are they just redistributing stuff that Atmel already ships as part of

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Support for AtMega328pb

2017-02-07 Thread Wilhelm Meier
Am 07.02.2017 um 14:36 schrieb Joerg Wunsch: > As Wilhelm Meier wrote: > >>> But of course, if you want to submit a patch yourself, feel free to >>> do so. The biggest work is to create the ioxxx.h header file. > >> ok, obviously done by Fa. Watterott. > > Are you sure? Or are they just

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Support for AtMega328pb

2017-02-07 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Wilhelm Meier wrote: > > In the latter case, we cannot simply move that code into the tree, > > because Atmel has the copyright for it. They at least have to agree, > > but sure, it would be easiest if they integrated it theirselves as > > they used to do in the past. > > is there a chance

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Support for AtMega328pb

2017-02-07 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As janegil.r...@microchip.com wrote: > We have spent quite some effort into detaching part support from > other toolchains and libraries. In doing this we can more easily > release support for new parts and fix bugs in the existing part > support. Part support is now distributed in