[avr-libc-dev] [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-bit eeprom addresses in devices with 8-Bit address registers

URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?21410 Summary: Incorrect use of 16-bit eeprom addresses in devices with 8-Bit address registers Project: AVR C Runtime Library Submitted by: robertvknobloch Submitted on: Wednesday 24/10/07 at 07:53

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #21411] Typographical error in 'iotn13.h'

URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?21411 Summary: Typographical error in 'iotn13.h' Project: AVR C Runtime Library Submitted by: robertvknobloch Submitted on: Wednesday 24/10/07 at 07:57 Category: Header

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-bit eeprom addresses in devices with 8-Bit address registers

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #21410 (project avr-libc): I thinks the current file is capable of handling this. But it always undefs EEARH to redefine it as EERAL+1. If we skip this then we might be ok, if the eeprom.S file is build per device not per architecture. Which must be the case otherwise

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-bit eeprom addresses in devices with 8-Bit address registers

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #21410 (project avr-libc): If we skip this then we might be ok, if the eeprom.S file is build per device not per architecture. Unfortunately, it actually *is* per architecture, not per device. That's the reason why it is compiled into two different object files (for

[avr-libc-dev] [patch #3851] 'dtostre' speed up

Update of patch #3851 (project avr-libc): Assigned to:None = dmix ___ Follow-up Comment #6: Dmitry, this is your submission anyway. I've got no idea whether this has already been

[avr-libc-dev] [patch #6161] macro change: numbering of vectors

Update of patch #6161 (project avr-libc): Priority: 5 - Normal = 3 - Low ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Basically, I like that idea, thanks! However, I'd like to defer the actual implementation

RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-bit eeprom addresses in devices with 8-Bit address registers

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 4:56 AM To: Wouter; Robert von Knobloch; Joerg Wunsch; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-bit

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Avrlibc and lcd.c

Hi Joerg, I hacked your LCD code a day before going on a trip so sorry it took so long to get back.. So I have a question.. I believe that the new code (separate ports definitions for control and data) is backward compatible with code written for a single port but I don't have any larger micros

RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-bit eepromaddresses in devices with 8-Bit address registers

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:28 AM To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-bit eepromaddresses in devices with 8-Bit

Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-bit eeprom addresses in devices with 8-Bit address registers

As Eric Weddington wrote: The only way I'm seeing is to compile it into four different object files (base address vs. 8- or 16-bit addressing), and extend the macro wrapper logic in avr/eeprom.h. Ugh. Please, let's not. I'd like to also consider future devices as well. ;-) Well, I

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-bit eepromaddresses in devices with 8-Bit address registers

Eric Weddington wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:28 AM To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-bit eepromaddresses in

RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-biteepromaddresses in devices with 8-Bit address registers

-Original Message- From: Wouter van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:14 PM To: Eric Weddington Cc: 'Joerg Wunsch'; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #21410] Incorrect use of 16-biteepromaddresses in devices with

[avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-libc-commit] avr-libc ChangeLog NEWS configure.ac devtools/g...

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nu.org] On Behalf Of Anatoly Sokolov Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 2:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [avr-libc-commit] avr-libc ChangeLog NEWS configure.ac devtools/g... CVSROOT: