RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h

2008-01-27 Thread Wouter van Gulik
Or inline functions defined in a header file. Sheesh. You guys are making comments about *how* I implemented the functionality, not if it *actually works*. Well I would, if I knew where to get the sources... There not on the list, not in the avr-libc bug report. So where can I find

RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h

2008-01-27 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Wouter van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 2:00 PM To: Weddington, Eric; 'Rick Altherr' Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h Or inline functions defined in a header file.

RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h

2008-01-27 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Preston Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 7:58 PM To: Weddington, Eric Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h Attached is my latest source. I did not receive any attached source in any of the email in this

Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h

2008-01-27 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Weddington, Eric wrote: I did not receive any attached source in any of the email in this thread including this last email from you. Trying again. Let me know if it's not attached this time. Not there. Do you remember that the list processor strips attachments of type