Hi,
I went into a strange situation in xmega128 project after reading from
signature or calibration row. I used the pgm_read_byte functions after
setting the NVM command accordingly. Both I did with disabled interrupts
to prevent any disturbing. I did not restored the NVM CMD because I
didn't
As Thomas Carsten Franke wrote:
I did not restored the NVM CMD because I
didn't know that it would has to be.
This is correct. We recently added a note to the documentation in the
header file avr/pgmspace.h telling that on Xmega devices, all the
functions will only work as designed if NVM_CMD
My apologies for the breakage. And thanks for fixing.
Eric
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-commit-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-commit-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nong
nu.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 1:56
As Wouter van Gulik wrote:
Although true, I rather think this is a GCC bug. The avr instruction
documentation says LPM R31, Z+ has undefined results. In the example
it was oke to use LPM R31, Z.
IMHO, the respective code is hand-crafted asm code in avr-libc.
Please file a bug report.
--
As Wouter van Gulik wrote:
IMHO, the respective code is hand-crafted asm code in avr-libc.
Are you sure? The code is about a jump table, is that in avr-libc?
Errm, you are right...
--
cheers, Jorg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
As Wouter van Gulik wrote:
Although true, I rather think this is a GCC bug. The avr instruction
documentation says LPM R31, Z+ has undefined results. In the example
it was oke to use LPM R31, Z.
IMHO, the respective code is hand-crafted asm code in
