Re: [avr-libc-dev] C11 Atomics and GCC libatomic

Got it. I'll add the support to GCC's libatomic then send it in. Thanks. On Jun 25, 2016 5:13 PM, "Joerg Wunsch" wrote: > As Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > > As libatomic will need close cooperation with the compiler, I'd > > recommend to add it to GCC. > > That would be my

Re: [avr-libc-dev] C11 Atomics and GCC libatomic

As Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > As libatomic will need close cooperation with the compiler, I'd > recommend to add it to GCC. That would be my recommendation, too. If it's a compile feature, it would better be there. Perhaps it's then even possible to find a more efficient implementation (no

[avr-libc-dev] Convenient macros

Hello! Maybe I just don't know something, but I made convenient macros which turns this code: [code] ... // For request DDRA &= ~_BV(PA2); // For LED DDRB |= _BV(PB3); // Wait for request loop_until_bit_is_set(PINA, PA2); // Turn LED on PORTB |= _BV(PB3); ... [/code] into this completely