[avr-libc-dev] [bug #24446] _attribute_ should be __attribute__ (with double underscores)

2008-10-03 Thread Juergen Weigert
URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?24446 Summary: _attribute_ should be __attribute__ (with double underscores) Project: AVR C Runtime Library Submitted by: jnweiger Submitted on: Fri 03 Oct 2008 11:55:04 PM GMT

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #24375] no FUSE_* defs for atmega48

2008-09-25 Thread Juergen Weigert
URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?24375 Summary: no FUSE_* defs for atmega48 Project: AVR C Runtime Library Submitted by: jnweiger Submitted on: Thu 25 Sep 2008 04:04:49 PM GMT Category: None

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #24375] no FUSE_* defs for atmega48

2008-09-25 Thread Juergen Weigert
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #24375 (project avr-libc): Already fixed. Thanks. ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?24375 ___ Message sent via/by Savannah

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #24323] many headers define EFUSE_DEFAULT as 0xff inconsistently

2008-09-22 Thread Juergen Weigert
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #24323 (project avr-libc): You are right. I missed the '~' in ~_BV(), sorry. Please close as invalid. ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?24323

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #22182] -mint8 kills stdio

2008-01-30 Thread Juergen Weigert
URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?22182 Summary: -mint8 kills stdio Project: AVR C Runtime Library Submitted by: jnweiger Submitted on: Wednesday 01/30/2008 at 20:58 Category: Library Severity: 3 -

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #22182] -mint8 kills stdio

2008-01-30 Thread Juergen Weigert
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22182 (project avr-libc): This happened with avr-libc-1.4.6 ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?22182 ___ Message sent via/by Savannah

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #12033] macros.inc need to be protected from multiple inclusion.

2005-05-19 Thread Juergen Weigert
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #12033 (project avr-libc): Untangling is definitly superior to patching the symtoms. Meanwhile patch #3997 keeps my gas happy. Keep up the good work! ___ Reply to this item at: