[awesome bugs] #708 - Installation of *.lua.in files

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task is now closed: FS#708 - Installation of *.lua.in files User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd) Reason for closing: Fixed Additional comments about closing: commit 1fd115589783fb0ab8401ec9ff845b62ede1a1d0 Author: Pierre Allegraud

Re: [Patch] Make the first entry in the layouts table the default again

At 1261384029 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote: Don't worry, you life is save now! The attached patch makes this easier! The suspense has been long enough: pushed. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ jul...@danjou.info http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD //

Re: #664 status

At 1261391738 time_t, Renato Botelho wrote: What does we need to do to confirm this? I changed the status. Hiltjo P. (bob127) submitted a patch, and jd commented saying it shouldn't touch awful.tag, what does we need to change on this patch to make it ok? JIC, it's working fine here and i

[awesome bugs] #709 - naughty doesn't implement org.freedekstop.Notifications.GetCapabilities()

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#709 - naughty doesn't implement org.freedekstop.Notifications.GetCapabilities() User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd) -- AFAICT STRING_ARRAY is ARRAY of STRING, not a type by itself. --

[awesome bugs] #711 - LyX spellchecker window confuses awesome (Attachment added)

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below. User who did this - Byron Clark (byronc) Attached to Project - awesome Summary - LyX spellchecker window confuses awesome Task Type - Bug Report Category - Core Status - Unconfirmed Assigned

[awesome bugs] #711 - LyX spellchecker window confuses awesome

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#711 - LyX spellchecker window confuses awesome User who did this - Byron Clark (byronc) -- LyX is a Qt4 application and in other window managers, the spellchecker window disappears immediately,

[awesome bugs] #551 - Notifications never disappear (Attachment added)

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#551 - Notifications never disappear User who did this - Hannes Schueller (mr_creosote) -- Well, it's been half a year and I've stopped using Awesome due to this and a couple of other issues by

[awesome bugs] #709 - naughty doesn't implement org.freedekstop.Notifications.GetCapabilities()

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#709 - naughty doesn't implement org.freedekstop.Notifications.GetCapabilities() User who did this - Uli Schlachter (psychon) -- hm ok. But looking at dbus.c (a_dbus_process_request), I *feel*

[awesome bugs] #551 - Notifications never disappear

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#551 - Notifications never disappear User who did this - Uli Schlachter (psychon) -- Trace looks like this isn't naughty's fault after all. :( I'm out of ideas. @Hannes Schueller: Thanks a lot.

Re: #664 status [PATCH]

The patch fixing that problem should not touch the call to with_current(), or make awful requires definitively awful.rules. But I guess that if you do that, people using other rules system such as shifty will start crying, because last time I heard about it, shifty was explicitely

[awesome bugs] #709 - naughty doesn't implement org.freedekstop.Notifications.GetCapabilities()

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#709 - naughty doesn't implement org.freedekstop.Notifications.GetCapabilities() User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd) -- You're correct. -- More information can be found at the

[awesome bugs] #712 - dbus: add ARRAY as possible return value

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below. User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd) Attached to Project - awesome Summary - dbus: add ARRAY as possible return value Task Type - Feature Request Category - Core Status - New Assigned To -

[awesome bugs] #699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported User who did this - Uli Schlachter (psychon) -- I downloaded a vanilla dwm, compiled it and started it in Xephyr. Both .cpp test apps show the exact

[awesome bugs] #551 - Notifications never disappear (Attachment added)

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#551 - Notifications never disappear User who did this - Hannes Schueller (mr_creosote) -- Oh, you're right, sorry, I made the first trace running DWM. Here's one using Awesome. -- One

[awesome bugs] #699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported User who did this - Uli Schlachter (psychon) -- I just had an idea: Could this be a race condition? - Qt's show() is called, it sends a MapWindow

[awesome bugs] #699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd) -- Sounds realistic. We probably miss a couple of xcb_{un,}grab_server() in the manage/unmanage function.

[awesome bugs] #699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported User who did this - Uli Schlachter (psychon) -- I don't think we can do much about this. If my guess really is the case, by the time we receive the

[awesome bugs] #664 - awful.rules

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#664 - awful.rules User who did this - Uli Schlachter (psychon) -- Anybody took a look at this bug from the C side of things? client_manage() (Called when we receive a MapRequest) creates a new

[awesome bugs] #712 - dbus: add ARRAY as possible return value (Attachment added)

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#712 - dbus: add ARRAY as possible return value User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd) -- Patches attached, but not tested. -- One or more files have been attached. More information can

[awesome bugs] #699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported User who did this - Uli Schlachter (psychon) -- dwm: As mentioned above, bug happens here, too. evilwm: Bug happens, too. evilwm receives a

[awesome bugs] #664 - awful.rules

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#664 - awful.rules User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd) -- One would just have to change client_focus_update() to only do the lua-side of things and the X stuff

[awesome bugs] #699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported User who did this - Andreas Kloeckner (inducer) -- Metacity and kwin are also both fine. -- More information can be found at the following

[awesome bugs] #699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd) -- Actually, I think taking a look on when wmaker does grab and ungrab the server and mimicking it may be

Re: #664 status [PATCH]

At 1261487619 time_t, koniu wrote: What about replacing the withcurrent() call with a: capi.client.add_signal(manage, withcurrent) ? -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ jul...@danjou.info http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // Anna Molly! Anna Molly! Anna Molly!

[awesome bugs] #699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported User who did this - Uli Schlachter (psychon) -- I looked at wmaker's source and I think I figured it out. At 1261491545.484 000::3b83: receives a

[awesome bugs] #699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported User who did this - Uli Schlachter (psychon) -- Hm, ok, here's the qt side of things: src/gui/kernel/qwidget_x11.cpp, QWidgetPrivate::hide_sys()

[awesome bugs] #699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#699 - hiding toplevel windows is not supported User who did this - Uli Schlachter (psychon) -- Ok, from XWithdrawWindow() I googled my way through its man page until I reached the ICCCM