Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1238751148 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
>> For example, without this patch, the following table would be said
>> to be looping:
>> { a = "asd", b = "asd" }
>>
>> I think this could also be triggered if a widget appeared twice
>> in a wibox.
>
> Hum, yeah. Fixed it in a
At 1238751148 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
> For example, without this patch, the following table would be said
> to be looping:
> { a = "asd", b = "asd" }
>
> I think this could also be triggered if a widget appeared twice
> in a wibox.
Hum, yeah. Fixed it in an other way. Can you check?
--
For example, without this patch, the following table would be said
to be looping:
{ a = "asd", b = "asd" }
I think this could also be triggered if a widget appeared twice
in a wibox.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter
---
luaa.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --g
