Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

2008-11-13 Thread Julien Danjou
At 1226615131 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote: Last time i checked the data was malloc'ed, and the initial state really needs to be false. But i'll double check. No, it's p_new() which is calloc() so everything is always clean. It's either this or a force argument to wibox_moveresize(),

Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

2008-11-13 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 1226615131 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote: Last time i checked the data was malloc'ed, and the initial state really needs to be false. But i'll double check. No, it's p_new() which is calloc() so everything is always

Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

2008-11-13 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Maarten Maathuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Maarten Maathuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 1226615131 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote: Last time i checked the