Re: [PATCH] awful.widget: Have taglist.label.all handle the noempty case too

Espen Wiborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And implement taglist.label.noempty in terms of it, using a flag > in the args table. This lets label.noempty lovers enjoy > tasklist_squares goodness. Argh, I think I accidentally swallowed a stupid pill. This patch is no good, a better one will appear

[awesome bugs] #334 - Ghosting windows on dualhead

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#334 - Ghosting windows on dualhead User who did this - Maarten Maathuis (madman2003) -- From the xlib manual, same idea should apply to xcb though: 10.11.3. MapRequest Events The X server can

[awesome bugs] #372 - incorect available geometry in dual screen mode

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#372 - incorect available geometry in dual screen mode User who did this - Maarten Maathuis (madman2003) -- How would qt know about an awesome specific statusbar? -- More information can b

Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> At 1226511972 time_t, Erik Garrison wrote: >>> As discussed in the EWMH, the window manager is given discretion in how >>> it manages offscree

[awesome bugs] #373 - X sometimes crashes when closing applications

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below. User who did this - Adam (ad_267) Attached to Project - awesome Summary - X sometimes crashes when closing applications Task Type - Bug Report Category - Core Status - Unconfirmed Assigned To

Patch for equal distribution of slave clients over slave columns in tiling mode

Hi there, as promised, I've made a patch to fix the unequal distribution of windows over the slave columns in tiling mode. I don't seem to be able to use git-send-email from my machine, as sendmail isn't configured. So instead, I attach the file generated using git format-patch. Cheers, Norbert

Re: awesome install_manifest

Since I am not familiar with cmake I guess I was being lazy and I hoped that someone in the list would fix it for us :) Anyway, here is a patch that I believe fixes the problem (at least it seems to work on my system). PS: To Julien, I am still puzzled that this bug is not present in the debian p

[PATCH] awful.widget: Have taglist.label.all handle the noempty case too

And implement taglist.label.noempty in terms of it, using a flag in the args table. This lets label.noempty lovers enjoy tasklist_squares goodness. Signed-off-by: Espen Wiborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- lib/awful/widget.lua.in | 41 ++--- 1 files changed, 10 in

Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 1226511972 time_t, Erik Garrison wrote: >> As discussed in the EWMH, the window manager is given discretion in how >> it manages offscreen client windows [1]. They may be unmapped (as in >> the definition of iconified f

[awesome bugs] #372 - incorect available geometry in dual screen mode

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below. User who did this - Damjan (gdamjan) Attached to Project - awesome Summary - incorect available geometry in dual screen mode Task Type - Bug Report Category - Core Status - Unconfirmed Assign

Re: awesome install_manifest

At 1226515461 time_t, Gregor Best wrote: > Bisecting yields a2f3790dce655b21a00465815406a2fc6900c819 as the first bad > commit. I suggest you retry your bisect, since this commits does not touch CMake files. :) -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB

Re: awesome install_manifest

At Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:22:43 +0100 Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 1226513729 time_t, Alex Cornejo wrote: > > With he latest git head, I noticed that my install_manifest.txt > > What is that? > The file lists all files installed by make install. Indeed, I can confirm the behaviour

Re: awesome install_manifest

At 1226514381 time_t, Alex Cornejo wrote: > However, lets leave the install_manifest.txt aside for the moment, > since you can confirm this behaviour without this file. Does the > latest version of awesome install the lua.in files on your system as > well? Seem not in the Debian package at least.

Re: awesome install_manifest

Its a file generated by the makefile scripts when running make install. It contains a list of all the files installed on your system, it is very handy when uninstalling something. However, lets leave the install_manifest.txt aside for the moment, since you can confirm this behaviour without this f

Re: awesome install_manifest

At 1226513729 time_t, Alex Cornejo wrote: > With he latest git head, I noticed that my install_manifest.txt What is that? -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

awesome install_manifest

With he latest git head, I noticed that my install_manifest.txt includes all the .lua.in files, Checking /usr/share/awesome/lib and /usr/share/awesome/themes/{default,sky} confirms the presence of this files. I ran cmake . (to regenerate the makefiles) and this behaviour is still there, however I

Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

At 1226511972 time_t, Erik Garrison wrote: > As discussed in the EWMH, the window manager is given discretion in how > it manages offscreen client windows [1]. They may be unmapped (as in > the definition of iconified found in the ICCCM) or managed via some > system of virtual root windows. Probl

Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:48:14PM +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 1226499132 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > >> I have one more question, are you oposed to this in a "i will never > >> change my mind" way, because

Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 1226499132 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote: >> I explained this once already, keeping windows mapped means their >> content remains available when composite is active, which means near >> instant tag switches (ignoring la

Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

At 1226499132 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > I explained this once already, keeping windows mapped means their > content remains available when composite is active, which means near > instant tag switches (ignoring layouts that do bad stuff). I got that, but that's not really on my concern as I

Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 1226495402 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote: >> This one should be better, but still needs real life testing ofcource. >> It handles titlebars and also discards any events generated by >> titlebars (based on client banned

Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

At 1226495402 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > This one should be better, but still needs real life testing ofcource. > It handles titlebars and also discards any events generated by > titlebars (based on client banned status).. I'm still totaly unconvinced about the goodness of this patch, but w

Re: [PATCH] better attempt at not unmapping windows upon hide

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This should be ICCCM compliant, and definately has the desired near >> instant tag switching speed. >> >> The change is that windows are no