On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> At 1226615131 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
Last tim
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> At 1226615131 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
>>> Last time i checked the data was malloc'ed, and the initial state
>>> really needs to be fa
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 1226615131 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
>> Last time i checked the data was malloc'ed, and the initial state
>> really needs to be false.
>> But i'll double check.
>
> No, it's p_new() which is calloc() so everything
At 1226615131 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> Last time i checked the data was malloc'ed, and the initial state
> really needs to be false.
> But i'll double check.
No, it's p_new() which is calloc() so everything is always clean.
> It's either this or a force argument to wibox_moveresize(), ch
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 1226613172 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
>> A much different patch.
>>
>> Setting XCB_WM_STATE_ICONIC on ban now, since that seems to be more
>> appropriate (it seems the ICCCM definition of that was left
>> intention
At 1226602511 time_t, Espen Wiborg wrote:
> As promised by the documentation comment for the keyboardhandler.
Thanks, pushed.
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
At 1226613172 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> A much different patch.
>
> Setting XCB_WM_STATE_ICONIC on ban now, since that seems to be more
> appropriate (it seems the ICCCM definition of that was left
> intentionally vague).
Ok.
> Note the wording "to indicate that a window would not be vis
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#373 - X sometimes crashes when closing applications
User who did this - Maarten Maathuis (madman2003)
--
That sw is definately a bad pointer.
My suspicion is that in wibox.c around line 174:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> At 1226511972 time_t, Erik Garrison wrote:
As discussed
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#373 - X sometimes crashes when closing applications
User who did this - Espen Wiborg (espenhw)
--
I just got awesome to crash by closing a Firefox window, and this time it
dumped core.
[EMAIL PR
As promised by the documentation comment for the keyboardhandler.
Signed-off-by: Espen Wiborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
lib/revelation.lua.in |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/revelation.lua.in b/lib/revelation.lua.in
index 91ec984..d4ea09f 100644
--- a/
Something I forgot to mention, after cloning the latest awesome head,
I had to change the awesomeConfig.cmake to get it to compile, here is
a patch to fix that (this however is unrelated to the bug discussed in
this thread).
Cheers,
Alex
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Alex Cornejo <[EMAIL PR
> Yes. This patch makes no sense to me since exluding .in files from
> build_dir is useless: there should not be any .in file.
> Can you clean everything using make distclean or git clean and doucle
> check?
I did something better than that:
rm -fR awesome
rm -fR /usr/share/awesome
git clone git:
At 1226545768 time_t, Norbert Zeh wrote:
> as promised, I've made a patch to fix the unequal distribution of
> windows over the slave columns in tiling mode. I don't seem to be able
> to use git-send-email from my machine, as sendmail isn't configured. So
> instead, I attach the file generated us
At 1226567949 time_t, Espen Wiborg wrote:
> This gives .noempty lovers a share in the taglist_squares goodness.
Thanks Espen, pushed.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
signature.asc
Description: D
At 1226525824 time_t, Alex Cornejo wrote:
> PS: To Julien, I am still puzzled that this bug is not present in the
> debian package? Is that debian package generated from the latest git
> head?
Yes. This patch makes no sense to me since exluding .in files from
build_dir is useless: there should not
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#373 - X sometimes crashes when closing applications
User who did this - Konstantin Stepanov (kstep)
--
The same is for me on FreeBSD 7.
--
More information can be found at the following U
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#372 - incorect available geometry in dual screen mode
User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd)
--
This seems to be not a bug, in fact.
Reading the source:
288 if ((d->screenCount == 1 || !isVi
This gives .noempty lovers a share in the taglist_squares goodness.
Signed-off-by: Espen Wiborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
lib/awful/widget.lua.in | 30 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/awful/widget.lua.in b/lib/awful/widget.lua.in
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#373 - X sometimes crashes when closing applications
User who did this - Espen Wiborg (espenhw)
--
This happens to me too. I've not been able to discern a pattern as to what
applications trigger
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#373 - X sometimes crashes when closing applications
User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd)
--
That depends on what you call crash. Does X crash or does awesome crashes?
If it's awesome, please se
21 matches
Mail list logo
