At 1228491660 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
> Since mouse.object_under_pointer() was the only function having problems with
> widget_getbycoords(), adding two lines of code to make the cursor position in
> object_under_pointer() relative to the wibox we are checking, solves the
> problem without the n
I have an alternate proposal:
Since mouse.object_under_pointer() was the only function having problems with
widget_getbycoords(), adding two lines of code to make the cursor position in
object_under_pointer() relative to the wibox we are checking, solves the
problem without the neccessity to modif
At 1228482146 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
> You mean as in, just return query_pointer_r and let the caller decide what
> values to get from that reply? Sounds reasonable. I'm not sure whether I'll
> get
> around to implementing that today, but by tomorrow, I should've done it.
This is what I exact
At Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:40:58 +0100
Julien Danjou wrote:
> [...]
> Your fix is good but I think you should directly enhance:
> mouse_query_pointer() to get its win_x and win_y fields.
>
> The problem is that then mouse_query_pointer will have 10 parameters,
> which is too big.
>
> I suggest we cha
At 1228414940 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
> I just noticed, the previous version of the patch crippled mouse buttons on
> widgets which are not on screen 1. The attached version fixes that, while
> still
> allowing to pass container_x and container_y to widget_getbycoords() so
> object_under_cursor
I just noticed, the previous version of the patch crippled mouse buttons on
widgets which are not on screen 1. The attached version fixes that, while still
allowing to pass container_x and container_y to widget_getbycoords() so
object_under_cursor() works for multiple screens. Thus, the patch only
Hi people,
while playing around with awful.mouse.widget_under_pointer(), I noticed that
widgets on the second screen of my XRandR setup don't get recognized. The
reason for that were bad coordinates for the widgets (the offset induced by
wibox->geometry.x / wibox->geometry.y was not considered). A
At 1228340472 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
> during the past days, I worked on getting a object_under_pointer method to
> work
> for capi.mouse. The old client_under_pointer went to awful.mouse, likewise did
> the two new functions wibox_under_pointer and widget_under_pointer.
>
> A thing to improv
Hi people,
during the past days, I worked on getting a object_under_pointer method to work
for capi.mouse. The old client_under_pointer went to awful.mouse, likewise did
the two new functions wibox_under_pointer and widget_under_pointer.
A thing to improve is also returning a wibox in object_unde