On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 19:23, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
At 1241720263 time_t, Andrei Thorp wrote:
Alright, I'm out of bugs thanks for patience. Good work.
And thank you for taking time to test. :)
OK, so now its in next and I have no choice but to take that time and test :)
One
At 1241969514 time_t, koniu wrote:
OK, so now its in next and I have no choice but to take that time and test :)
One thing I can say so far is that having get_workarea() in
awful.wibox is a bit counter-intuitive, it should go to awful.screen.
That would require adding a function to export
Hi,
These last days I've worked on moving the screen padding on Lua.
That's why the branch is named like that.
But well, I continued to dig and move some wibox code in Lua. The big
change is that all wiboxes are now floating. There's a set of useful
function in awful.wibox to move them, attach
I'll give a whirl.
-AT
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
Hi,
These last days I've worked on moving the screen padding on Lua.
That's why the branch is named like that.
But well, I continued to dig and move some wibox code in Lua. The big
change is
At 1241711728 time_t, Andrei Thorp wrote:
I'm trying to use the default config after a clean build/install of
the latest. There seem to be three issues:
- The wibox is only about an inch wide (doesn't stretch all the way along)
There's a call to stretch in the default config.
Check that you
At 1241711920 time_t, Julien Danjou wrote:
Other Info:
- Dual monitor
Did not test dual monitor there might be bugs without the second bar. :)
Ok, I just did and it was broken. I fixed it and repushed my branch.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ jul...@danjou.info
Right, sorry, I did screw up. DId it properly now with the default config.
- Doesn't respect the position argument (top regardless of whether I
put left or not)
That's true, it's not used now.
I'd, for one, like this feature back eventually. It's nice to specify
the position rather than
At 1241716551 time_t, Andrei Thorp wrote:
I'd, for one, like this feature back eventually. It's nice to specify
the position rather than doing the attach step.
Well, that's not possible as a *feature*.
It'd be possible has a dirty hack for transition, eventually, yes.
Or we can add a
At 1241720263 time_t, Andrei Thorp wrote:
Alright, I'm out of bugs thanks for patience. Good work.
And thank you for taking time to test. :)
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ jul...@danjou.info http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
// Anna Molly! Anna Molly!
