Still looks fine to me, too.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 10/03/2013 05:17 PM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
On 10/3/2013 11:30 AM, Oleg Pekhovskiy wrote:
Hi All,
please review the second version of fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bagiras/7068423.2/
It looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Artem
Reason:
Hi All,
please review the second version of fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bagiras/7068423.2/
Reason:
Discussed with Artem and Andrew, came to conclusion that there were
situations when returned object could be also set by the system, and not
by the client application through
On 10/3/2013 11:30 AM, Oleg Pekhovskiy wrote:
Hi All,
please review the second version of fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bagiras/7068423.2/
It looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Artem
Reason:
Discussed with Artem and Andrew, came to conclusion that there were
situations when returned object
Looks fine.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 10/01/2013 04:37 PM, Oleg Pekhovskiy wrote:
Hi all,
please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bagiras/7068423.1/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7068423
It's just a Javadoc fix.
Thanks,
Oleg
