On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Sanka Samaranayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Glen,
- Let's aim to get 1.4.1 out the door at the end of next week, i.e. July
18th (is that enough time, Nandana?).
I
+1 for Nandana as the Release Manager
I would also like to see the memory leak fixed for a 1.4.1 release :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3870
How do we suggest bugs/fixes to be included in the 1.4.1 release ? In Jira ?
/hans
Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008
+1 for Nandana as the release manager.
/sumedha
+1
Thank you!
Deepal
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Nandana,
+1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
IMHO, we should use 1.4 branch. The *ONLY* change should be the
security change. Nothing more.
thanks,
dims
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
[EMAIL
Hehe :)
I was wondering why did Glen tell that , I even went and read old mails :)
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
s/Deepal/Dims/ ? :)
Glen Daniels wrote:
|
| Deepal, what are you so worried about, exactly? That it will take
| forever to get the release out?
|
| IMHO, a point release is for fixing
Guys, Axis2 module follow the version semantics of
[major.minor]
Thus, having addressing-1.4.1.mar will cause problem in version resolution.
Am I making an absurd assumption here ?
Saminda
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Deepal Jayasinghe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hehe :)
I was wondering
But it seems that we have done an Axis2 1.1.1 with adressing-1.1.1.mar and
soapmonitor-1.1.1.mar modules. Will this be a problem ?
thanks,
nandana
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Saminda Abeyruwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Guys, Axis2 module follow the version semantics of
[major.minor]
IMHO when it comes to .mar files we should version them as x.yz
In the case of 1.4.1 release the mar file versions can be: 1.41
This confirms to the module version constraints of Axis2.
Thanks,
Ruchith
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Saminda Abeyruwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys, Axis2
+1 for Nandana as the Release Manager
Regards
Lahiru Sandakith
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nandana,
+1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
IMHO, we should use 1.4 branch. The *ONLY* change should be the
security change. Nothing
+1 for Nandana as the release manager..
thanks,
Thilina
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Lahiru Sandakith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1 for Nandana as the Release Manager
Regards
Lahiru Sandakith
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nandana,
+1
Nandana,
+1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
+1 for Nandana as the release manager
Nandana
I would also like to suggest
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3887 for inclusion, as this
prevents Synapse from using the servlet transport effectively, since
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Glen,
- Let's aim to get 1.4.1 out the door at the end of next week, i.e. July
18th (is that enough time, Nandana?).
I think we have to check Sanka's input on this. He will be fixing the
major issue
+1 for Nandana as the release manager.
Thanks,
Ruchith
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nandana,
+1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
IMHO, we should use 1.4 branch. The *ONLY* change should be the
security change. Nothing more.
Nandana,
+1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
IMHO, we should use 1.4 branch. The *ONLY* change should be the
security change. Nothing more.
thanks,
dims
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to volunteer to be the
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nandana,
+1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
+ 1 from me.
IMHO, we should use 1.4 branch. The *ONLY* change should be the
security change. Nothing more.
I think we need to fix any possible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Exactly what i was afraid of :( Sigh! this is a *very* slippery slope.
- -- dims
Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
| On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Nandana,
|
| +1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for
Deepal, what are you so worried about, exactly? That it will take
forever to get the release out?
IMHO, a point release is for fixing critical issues, and should not
necessarily be limited to one particular issue. I think we should run
this basically just like a regular release but with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
s/Deepal/Dims/ ? :)
Glen Daniels wrote:
|
| Deepal, what are you so worried about, exactly? That it will take
| forever to get the release out?
|
| IMHO, a point release is for fixing critical issues, and should not
| necessarily be limited to one
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
s/Deepal/Dims/ ? :)
Oh for crying out... sorry Dims!!! I was just reading a bunch of the
JIRA edits from Deepal (and haven't had coffee yet today). *blush*
--G
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Two more things.
1) Obviously +1 to Nandana as RM, which I forgot to say explicitly. :)
2) To be crystal clear, my suggestion is to time-bound the release and
ONLY fix what can be finished in the allotted time, which should prevent
the slippery slope problem. If people want we can also
Hi Glen,
- Let's aim to get 1.4.1 out the door at the end of next week, i.e. July
18th (is that enough time, Nandana?).
I think we have to check Sanka's input on this. He will be fixing the major
issue in policy.
- As always it's good to go through at least one RC so people can kick the
21 matches
Mail list logo
