Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
-tutorials/48-esb-performance.html cheers asankha Following up on some earlier discussions of Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance, devWorks has now published my latest article in the Java Web Services series, comparing Axis2/Rampart with Metro WS-Security performance: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks

RE: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Martin Gainty
/Rampart http://adroitlogic.org/samples-articles-and-tutorials/15-tutorials/48-esb-performance.html cheers asankha Following up on some earlier discussions of Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance, devWorks has now published my latest article in the Java Web Services series, comparing

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Amila Suriarachchi
of Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance, devWorks has now published my latest article in the Java Web Services series, comparing Axis2/Rampart with Metro WS-Security performance: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jws11/ The results are very bad for Axis2/Rampart, with Metro more

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Asankha C. Perera
Hi Amila how many messages you sent for one scenario test? i.e for eg 500b message with 640 threads This depends on the concurrency, and can be found exactly by looking at the script used to run the load test. For example, when 20 users were being used, the iterations were 1000, while for 2560

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Amila Suriarachchi
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Asankha C. Perera asan...@apache.orgwrote: Hi Amila how many messages you sent for one scenario test? i.e for eg 500b message with 640 threads This depends on the concurrency, and can be found exactly by looking at the script used to run the load test. For

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Asankha C. Perera
Hi Amila In the very first scenario upto 640 concurrency level both have same through put while for 1280 threads UE has a sudden increment and for 2560 other ESB has a relatively high change. What could be the reason for that? Which set are you referring to - the

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-01 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
policy based validations. Would be glad if you could please confirm it. Thanks regards. -Prabath Dennis Sosnoski wrote: Following up on some earlier discussions of Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance, devWorks has now published my latest article in the Java Web Services series, comparing

Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-01-30 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
Following up on some earlier discussions of Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance, devWorks has now published my latest article in the Java Web Services series, comparing Axis2/Rampart with Metro WS-Security performance: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jws11/ The results

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-01-30 Thread Prabath Siriwardena
- it could open up holes for attacks like XML wrapping attacks. I found few occasions that Metro doesn't do policy based validations. Would be glad if you could please confirm it. Thanks regards. -Prabath Dennis Sosnoski wrote: Following up on some earlier discussions of Axis2/Rampart WS

Re: Axis2 + Rampart + WS-Security

2007-08-07 Thread Ruchith Fernando
IMHO this is out of the scope of WS-Security specification and WS-SecureConversation will be able to help. You can authenticate the user and create the security context. Now you can use this context in sending the subsequent messages. Thanks, Ruchith On 7/10/07, Kevin TierOne [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Axis2 + Rampart + WS-Security

2007-07-10 Thread Kevin TierOne
I have a question about the capabilities of the rampart module. I would like to create a client that sends several SOAP messages to the server. The messages are currently authenticated using the UsernameToken in a PWCallback class. Is it possible to create a session identifier when processing