2.0 release branch (WSIF_2_0_BRANCH)

2003-01-17 Thread Aleksander Slominski
hi, to minimize impact of last minute changes i have created WSIF_2_0_BRANCH to host the first official 2.0 release of WSIF outside the main trunk. in this branch i have backed up last changes concerning caching of WSIFOperations as i think this is not good idea to make such big changes just a

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/lib/j2ee README.txt

2003-01-17 Thread aslom
aslom 2003/01/17 17:25:14 Modified:java Tag: WSIF_2_0_BRANCH build.xml java/lib/j2ee Tag: WSIF_2_0_BRANCH README.txt Log: re-enabled compile j2c sample (J2EE 1.3.1 is required) and fixed problem with not copying WSDL extension documentation in distribution zi

MessageContext and OperationDesc

2003-01-17 Thread Brian Madigan
Is it normal for MessageContext to return null from getOperation( ) when called by a Handler? I'm trying to get the operation's name in a Handler but I can't get a OperationDesc instance from the MessageContext. Regards, Brian. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yah

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16220] - JSSESocketFactory missing "implements SecureSocketFactory"

2003-01-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16220] New: - JSSESocketFactory missing "implements SecureSocketFactory"

2003-01-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Mail testing spam

2003-01-17 Thread Tom Jordahl
So I haven't seen any Axis-dev mail today, which means that my mail must be broken. So this is a test. -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia Server Development

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis

2003-01-17 Thread Steve Loughran
As you can see: gump is working properly again :) - Original Message - From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 06:07 Subject: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis > > This email is autogenerat

Re: SOAP stacktrace from Axis to .NET

2003-01-17 Thread Steve Loughran
Unlikely. Axis1.1 doesnt send stack traces over the wire at all unless you edit the config to say 'development system'. And it does this by purging the stacktrace element from the detail XML just before sending the message over the wire...tricks like that are why the xml details are the best place

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/soap/apacheaxis WSIFPort_ApacheAxis.java WSIFOperation_ApacheAxis.java

2003-01-17 Thread antelder
antelder2003/01/17 08:29:08 Modified:java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/soap/apacheaxis WSIFPort_ApacheAxis.java WSIFOperation_ApacheAxis.java Log: Fix bugzilla 16196 - reinstate the axis WSIFPort caching of WSIFOperations that it crea

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16212] New: - WSIF AXIS provider no longer supports jms:property parts in the input message

2003-01-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: RMIProvider

2003-01-17 Thread Dave Martin
Will do. Thanks, Dave --- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave, > > Check the latest cvs/nightly...We have some code > already. (See > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/providers/java/RMIProvider.java). > > Here's what you can do... > 1. try what

Re: RMIProvider

2003-01-17 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Dave, Check the latest cvs/nightly...We have some code already. (See http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/providers/java/RMIProvider.java). Here's what you can do... 1. try what we have 2. tweak what we have with your changes 3. write up a mini doc on how to use the

RMIProvider

2003-01-17 Thread Dave Martin
I have written a provider that provides a reference to a RMI object bound into a RMI registry and would like to contribute the code to the Axis project. This new provider required two new source files: 1)org.apache.axis.providers.java.RMIProvider 2)org.apache.axis.deployment.wsdd.providers.WSDDJav

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16199] New: - response soap headers not passed to WSIF client

2003-01-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16192] New: - array serialization on response introducing an extraneous item element

2003-01-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16197] New: - axis provider messaging with attachments don't work

2003-01-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16196] New: - WSIF AXIS provider performance unacceptable

2003-01-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[GUMP] Build Failure - Axis

2003-01-17 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: Build results exceed maximum length. Please see URL above for details. Last 50 li

Re: Stateful Web Services

2003-01-17 Thread Toshiyuki Kimura
Hi Thomas, (B (B I'm delighted that you show me understanding in my thought. (B (B Anyway, I think if an AXIS user (or whoever) wants to know (Banything detailed, that should be welcomed, independent of (Bthe reason. (B In this case, it's very important to the learner that (Bthe well-inf

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/schema SimpleType.java

2003-01-17 Thread owenb
owenb 2003/01/17 02:46:39 Modified:java/src/org/apache/wsif/schema Tag: pre1_2_0-patches SimpleType.java Log: Oops...isSimple() should return true Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/schema SimpleType.java

2003-01-17 Thread owenb
owenb 2003/01/17 02:45:48 Modified:java/src/org/apache/wsif/schema SimpleType.java Log: Oops...isSimple() should return true Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +1 -1 xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/schema/SimpleType.java Index: SimpleType.java ===

SOAP stacktrace from Axis to .NET

2003-01-17 Thread Thomas Börkel
HI! Axis server puts the stacktrace of an exception into . .NET client expects the stacktrace embedded in (see example). Any chance to get Axis to do this .NET like (I recon SOAP stacktraces are not standardized)? Thanks! .NET stacktrace example: http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>