release plan and communicating about changes [Re: [VOTE/WSIF] 2.0release branch (WSIF_2_0_BRANCH)]

Anthony Elder wrote: What is going on??? hi Ant, i thought that is precisely why we have release plan checked into repository, irc chats, and mailing list to keep everybody informed about who is working on what for 2.0 release. i am afraid that seeing CVS logs is not enough when putting rel

release date and content [Re: [WSIF] 2.0 release branch (WSIF_2_0_BRANCH)]

Owen D Burroughs wrote: I agree we need a code freeze before the release but I think we (the active committers) need to agree if the time is now. Whilst Thursday has been mentioned as release day, I don't see the harm in delaying for a short period to sort out outstanding issues that people have.

Webstart / Proxy / Axis Client - does Axis recognize the Webstart Proxy ?

Title: Nachricht Hello everyone,   if I deploy a Client based on Axis as Webstart Application - does Webstart set the System Properties for the Proxy ? Can Axis handle this or do I have to add a functionality in the client so the User can set the Proxy himself ? Currently I'm using a CVS c

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/soap12/assertion Soap12TestRpcBindingImpl.java

dims2003/01/20 15:16:23 Modified:java/test/wsdl/soap12/assertion Soap12TestRpcBindingImpl.java Log: fix return param Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1 xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/soap12/assertion/Soap12TestRpcBindingImpl.java Index: S

Re: [VOTE/WSIF] 2.0 release branch (WSIF_2_0_BRANCH)

What is going on??? We've just had a discussion about the RC2 that Alek has built and that its from a personal branch which has had committed changes backed out. We've just had a vote on this and so far have four +1 votes to NOT using that branch, and four +1 votes to having an RC2 based off hea

Re: [VOTE/WSIF] 2.0 release branch (WSIF_2_0_BRANCH)

Hi Nirmal, On your first point, I agree with you, changes after RC1 *were* allowed. Before we declare a code freeze we really should vote on when that code freeze takes effect from, then no committer will have excuses for posting fixes after that. A key part of that discussion would be what fixes

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/util WSIFUtils.java

antelder2003/01/20 11:57:59 Modified:java/src/org/apache/wsif/util Tag: pre1_2_0-patches WSIFUtils.java Log: Defect 157021 - add new getExtensionRegistry method Revision ChangesPath No revision No revisio

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/soap12/assertion Soap12TestDocBindingImpl.java Soap12TestRpcBindingImpl.java WhiteMesaSoap12TestSvcTestCase.java

dims2003/01/20 11:19:59 Modified:java/test/wsdl/soap12/assertion Soap12TestDocBindingImpl.java Soap12TestRpcBindingImpl.java WhiteMesaSoap12TestSvcTestCase.java Log: - Populate the test case (there are 3 test

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16271] New: - WSIFUtils method initializeProviders should be public

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils WSDLUtils .java

+1 on the SOAP 1.2 enhancements and interop tests. This is much goodness! -- Tom Jordahl -Original Message- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils WSD

RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils WSDLUtils .java

ok. stopping right now :) Thanks for the update. When Glen gets back, hopefully he can work on the soap1.2 interop tests. FYI, I was trying to use Bob's WSDL's @ http://www.whitemesa.net/test-soap12/soap12-test-index.htm to get server-side Impls for SOAP1.2 testing. Thanks, dims --- Tom Jorda

Re: Axis building clean?

Rick, Can you please try now...I made a temp fix to SymbolTable.java. (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=104308602713497&w=2) Thanks, dims --- Rick Rineholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a freshly checked on version of Axis I'm receiving the below error > while building all. Anyone

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/providers/java RPCProvider.java

dims2003/01/20 10:08:01 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/providers/java RPCProvider.java Log: Throw inner exception only if it exists. Revision ChangesPath 1.103 +3 -1 xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/providers/java/RPCProvider.java Index: RPCProvider

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/symbolTable SymbolTable.java

dims2003/01/20 10:07:00 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/symbolTable SymbolTable.java Log: Temporary fix for Gump Failure with soap12-add-test.wsdl Notes: - Is the WSDL bad? Need to rollback this fix if so. Revision ChangesPath 1.71 +2 -0 xml-a

Re: [WSIF] 2.0 release branch (WSIF_2_0_BRANCH)

Hi all, I agree we need a code freeze before the release but I think we (the active committers) need to agree if the time is now. Whilst Thursday has been mentioned as release day, I don't see the harm in delaying for a short period to sort out outstanding issues that people have. Obviously we don

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16269] - WSIF JMS Provider - JMS Message incorrectly uses the message namespace to compute the part QName

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16269] New: - WSIF JMS Provider - JMS Message incorrectly uses the message namespace to compute the part QName

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Axis building clean?

In a freshly checked on version of Axis I'm receiving the below error while building all.  Anyone else see this?  Gump is failing on a prereq so it's difficult to tell if it my environment or Axis.  using java full version "1.3.1_04-b02" Alternatively, can anyone build completely with the latest

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16263] - WSDL2Java generates incorrect code for void functions that throw Exceptions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16263] - WSDL2Java generates incorrect code for void functions that throw Exceptions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [WSIF] 2.0 release branch (WSIF_2_0_BRANCH)

Hi, Just a couple of points I'd like to make. 1. The emails below make it sound like there were no code changes allowed after the RC1, when in fact the RC1 was cut four weeks ago and we have had new samples, new J2C stuff, new bug fixes, etc. So it's not like we agreed on allowing changes and th

RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils WSDLUtils.java

> - Upgrading WSDL2Java to support WSDL 1.2 as well >(http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-wsdl12-20020709/) Uh... I wouldn't do any work on this right now. The working group (which I am a member of) is busy trying to solve lots of fun problems which in the process is turning what is called WSDL 1.2

RE: Another test

Turns out that my "Axis" folder was collecting mail, but was moved in the Deleted Items folder somehow. What a bonehead move on my part... -- Tom Jordahl -Original Message- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16263] New: - WSDL2Java generates incorrect code for void functions that throw Exceptions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: MessageContext and OperationDesc

Is the handler runing before the operation is determined? That would be a good reason why it isn't set yet. :-) -- Tom Jordahl -Original Message- From: Brian Madigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MessageContext and Opera

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16192] - array serialization on response introducing an extraneous item element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Another test

Same here!! Sanjiva. - Original Message - From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:32 AM Subject: Another test > > I apologize for more spam, but I am still subscribed to the list, but haven't seen *any* messages that have been po

Re: [WSIF] 2.0 release branch (WSIF_2_0_BRANCH)

Yes, there is no code freeze yet, as we agreed. +1 for a) provided new bug(s) will be considered (I may have a candidate) +1 for b) Piotr. Regards, Piotr Przybylski, IBM Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Another test

I apologize for more spam, but I am still subscribed to the list, but haven't seen *any* messages that have been posted. Could it be that running Outlook from Office XP has done something really bad to my exchange rules? Grumble, Grumble.. -- Tom Jordahl

Re: [WSIF] 2.0 release branch (WSIF_2_0_BRANCH)

I agree. There has never been any discussion on a code freeze, the only reason people voted +1 to having and RC1 instead of a Beta2 was on the explicit understanding that we could continue making changes for now. Given this I really feel point A in the vote before is unwarranted but in the sake o

Re: [WSIF] 2.0 release branch (WSIF_2_0_BRANCH)

Hi Alek, I'm curious as to why you've branched the code here. I would have expected the final release for 2.0 be point in time on the trunk, so at a later date anyone can get this tagged level off the trunk and don't have to search around a branch to find that level. On creating the WSIF_2_0_BRAN

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/test/inout/wsifservice deploy.wsdd Inout.wsdl

whitlock2003/01/20 07:56:36 Modified:java/test/inout InoutTest.java java/test/addressbook/wsifservice deploy.wsdd java/test/inout/wsifservice Inout.wsdl Added: java/test/inout/wsifservice deploy.wsdd Log: Support testing against an axis server

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/soap/apacheaxis WSIFOperation_ApacheAxis.java

whitlock2003/01/20 06:34:09 Modified:java/test/mime Mime.wsdl MimeTest.java Mime.java MimeImpl.java MimeBadSoapBodyType.wsdl DeploymentDescriptor.xml java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/soap/apacheaxis

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif WSIFConstants.java

antelder2003/01/20 05:53:55 Modified:java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/soap/apacheaxis WSIFOperation_ApacheAxis.java java/src/org/apache/wsif WSIFConstants.java Log: Fix bugzilla bug 16199 - support setting response SOAP headers in the Context

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/soap/apacheaxis WSIFOperation_ApacheAxis.java

antelder2003/01/20 05:13:41 Modified:java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/soap/apacheaxis WSIFOperation_ApacheAxis.java Log: Fix bugzilla bug 16256 - the WSIF AXIS operation was setting the operation style incorrectly. I've move the setting of this to the prepa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16256] New: - WSIF AXIS Operation uses incorrect encoding style

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16252] New: - axis.ServerConfigFile not working

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu