:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Face-to-face meeting choices
>
>
> I put a fairly heavy weight to places committers couldn't go,
> in which case
> SF is losing. Austin and Boston are nearly tied, Boston
> leading slightly.
>
> Glen, can
ECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: Face-to-face meeting choices
By my count SF is in the lead so far by a few. Among the committers who
have voted so far, it's SF slightly in the lead and tied between Austin and
Boston. Dims is the only committer so far with X's, as he could only
attend in Boston.
--Glen
_1_ May 22, 23 in Austin (hosted by IBM)
_3_ May 22, 23 in Boston (hosted by Macromedia)
_2_ June 5,6 in San Francisco (hosted by IBM) (some folks will be at the
Interop and XML/WS1 conference this week so they'd be able to combine 2
trips into one).
cc:
Subject: Face-to-face meeting choices
04/16/2002 01:51
_1_ May 22, 23 in Austin (hosted by IBM)
_3_ May 22, 23 in Boston (hosted by Macromedia)
_2_ June 5,6 in San Francisco (hosted by IBM) (some folks will be at the
Interop and XML/WS1 conference this week so they'd be able to combine 2
trips into one).
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ssage-
From: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Face-to-face meeting choices
Here are the 3 choices we have for the face-to-face meeting. We are trying
to get as many of us together as we can. For those who would like
Thanks for sending this out, Russell!
> _3_ May 22, 23 in Austin (hosted by IBM)
> _1_ May 22, 23 in Boston (hosted by Macromedia)
> _2_ June 5,6 in San Francisco (hosted by IBM) (some folks
> will be at the
> Interop and XML/WS1 conference this week so they'd be able to
> combine 2
> trips
Here are the 3 choices we have for the face-to-face meeting. We are trying
to get as many of us together as we can. For those who would like to go,
please vote for each of these, 1 for first choice, 2 for second, 3 for
third. Put an X by any date/place you cannot make. We'll try to get as
many
