Re: Axis performance enhancement

2002-11-25 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Thanks for taking the time for this very important issue. Looking forward to patches/test-cases from you. Please add them to bugzilla directly and one of us will look into it. Thanks, dims --- Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been doing some investigations into Axis performance

Re: Axis performance

2002-10-18 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: "Kenneth Chiu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:08 PM Subject: Re: Axis performance > On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Steve Loughran wrote: > > Interesting to see that FP to ascii conv

Re: Axis performance

2002-10-18 Thread Kenneth Chiu
send the double as text, but include a hint which can be used to speed up the FP conversion. We haven't investigated this yet, though. > - Original Message - > From: "Scott Nichol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Axis performance

2002-10-18 Thread Kenneth Chiu
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Tom Jordahl wrote: > But the nice thing is that the authors make the comment > that their results might help to make Axis better. I > would like to think that they might provide patches that > would make things faster. This could be wishful thinking > on my part > > -- >

Re: Axis performance

2002-10-15 Thread Scott Nichol
> Regarding nagling, HTTP1.0 is so aggressively sub-optimal that it is always > tempting to turn it off, yet TCP_NODELAY on long haul links is both > anti-social and often counter-productive. Maybe clients should decide > dynamically whether to delay or not depending on whether or not the endpoint

Re: Axis performance

2002-10-15 Thread Steve Loughran
TED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:03 AM Subject: Re: Axis performance > Something this paper does not touch upon that has been much discussed on > the Apache SOAP lists is disabling the Nagle algorithm, i.e. calling > setTcpNoDelay(true), on the client socket. Basically, wit

Re: Axis performance

2002-10-15 Thread Scott Nichol
> Delayed ACK > withholds the ACK for a packet for typically 200 ms when either the > packet is not a full MAC frame or the preceeding packet is not a full > frame, although the delay is cancelled if the server has data to send to > the client, in which case the ACK is sent with the data. Correct

Re: Axis performance

2002-10-15 Thread Scott Nichol
Something this paper does not touch upon that has been much discussed on the Apache SOAP lists is disabling the Nagle algorithm, i.e. calling setTcpNoDelay(true), on the client socket. Basically, with the Nagle algorithm enabled (the default), the client TCP/IP stack sends each data packet after

RE: Axis performance

2002-10-15 Thread Tom Jordahl
But the nice thing is that the authors make the comment that their results might help to make Axis better. I would like to think that they might provide patches that would make things faster. This could be wishful thinking on my part -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia Server Development -O

RE: Axis performance

2002-10-15 Thread Glen Daniels
Their tests were run back in May. We've had several multiples of performance improvement since then. It would be interesting to run them again against the current codebase. --Glen > -Original Message- > From: Douglas Bitting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 20