Nice!
I would like to propose an effort to fork the serialization and
deserialization/XML-Java Mapping subsystem to define a more generic API
based on popular frameworks already out there. While I agree that any
current API might have to be proprietary, it could be better split from
the re
Hi all,
I think this would be a good FAQ point.
> Hi Tim!
>
> It is certainly possible to store the metadata anywhere you want - the
>TypeDesc.getTypeDescForClass()
> method is the control point there. Right now we look for a) inline static metdata,
>and b) a "Helper" class
> which contains
Hi
Tim!
It is
certainly possible to store the metadata anywhere you want - the
TypeDesc.getTypeDescForClass() method is the control point there. Right
now we look for a) inline static metdata, and b) a "Helper" class which contains
the metadata. This could easily be extended to include
