RE: WSDL2Java doc/literal port type interface

2002-03-14 Thread Russell Butek
Good idea! User's Guide, here I come... Russell Butek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/14/2002 09:07:54 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: WSDL2Java doc/li

RE: WSDL2Java doc/literal port type interface

2002-03-14 Thread Tom Jordahl
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WSDL2Java doc/literal port type interface It is VERY unfortunate that the interface needs information from both the portType AND the binding. This is a topic of discussion for WSDL version 2. JAX-RPC says (section 4.3.3): "The name of the Java interface is mapped

Re: WSDL2Java doc/literal port type interface

2002-03-14 Thread Russell Butek
It is VERY unfortunate that the interface needs information from both the portType AND the binding. This is a topic of discussion for WSDL version 2. JAX-RPC says (section 4.3.3): "The name of the Java interface is mapped from the name attribute of the wsdl:portType element. ... If the mapping